Interpreting Young's Light Interference Data: Can You Help Me Clear My Doubts?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around interpreting Young's light interference data from an experiment involving a diffraction grating. The original poster seeks clarification on identifying bright order positions in their data, questioning whether specific positions correspond to central and higher-order bright fringes. Respondents suggest that the data may reflect a complex interaction between single-slit diffraction and grating interference, noting unusual intensity patterns and spacing. They emphasize the importance of understanding the experimental setup, including whether the grating is a simple array or has a unique transmission profile. Overall, the interpretation of the data appears plausible, but further details about the setup are necessary for a definitive analysis.
JosefMTD
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hello!
I have done this experiment and managed to find this data:
http://puu.sh/bO8TJ/ac3520ec8b.png

Am I right for saying that the position that reaches the value of 5 amps are the central bright and the position 220-ish as the 1st bright order and the position 260-ish as the 2nd bright order?

Or is it also okay to say that the position around 130 is a 1st bright order, the position around 90 is a 2nd bright order and position around 50 is a 3rd bright order and the position around 10 is the 4th bright order?

I'm having this doubt analyzing this data, can anyone help me clear my doubt?
Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
It would help a lot if you could describe your setup first. I guess it's a grating (multiple number of slits). So you have a grating-interference pattern with the interference pattern of the single slit as the envelop or something like this, I guess.
 
Strange envelope shape. Strange intensity units. Strangely even linear spacing of maxima, too, if this is a grating. Would be interesting to know the set-up.
 
Ya, this is a single slit enveloped a grating
 
Ya, this is a single slit enveloped a grating
 
I think this is hard to interpret. If the diffraction grating is a simple array of evenly spaced rectangular slits then the zeroth order beam would be the most intense, and the intensity of beams on either side would fall off, higher order beams becoming less intense. The reason for that is the 'modulating' single slit diffraction pattern, which gives the 'envelope'.

The pattern you have is not what I've just described, because the envelope is quite different in shape. This may be because you are using a diffraction grating which isn't much like an array of rectangular slits, but instead some other periodic variation of transmission as we go across the grating. It may be a reflection grating - you don't say which. The 'transmission profile' (or 'reflection profile') may be specially designed so the intensity is greater in certain higher orders.

Are we even dealing with light? Or some other electromagnetic wave?

With no more information than what you've given us, I'd say that your interpretation is quite likely to be the right one.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top