"Intersection Equality iff Function is Injective

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around a property of functions related to injectiveness and the equality of images under intersection of sets. The original poster presents a statement involving sets A and B, subsets C and D, and a function f, exploring the condition under which the image of the intersection of two sets equals the intersection of their images.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to prove the implication that if the equality holds, then the function must be injective, but expresses difficulty in connecting the equality of images to the uniqueness of preimages. Some participants suggest a proof by contradiction and explore constructing sets that would violate the equality if the function is not injective.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with one providing a proof attempt and another offering feedback to clarify the reasoning. There is a productive exchange of ideas, with some guidance on how to structure the proof more clearly.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves assumptions about the properties of functions and the definitions of injectiveness, as well as the implications of set operations in the context of function images.

ELESSAR TELKONT
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let A, B be sets, C,D\subset A and f:A\longrightarrow B be a function between them. Then f(C\cap D)=f(C)\cap f(D) if and only if f is injective.

Homework Equations



Another proposition, that I have proven that for any function f(C\cap D)\subset f(C)\cap f(D), and the definition of injectiveness: f is inyective if \forall b\in B\mid b=f(x)=f(y) for some x,y\in A implies that x=y.

The Attempt at a Solution



If we suppose the injectiveness is trivial to get the equality. But for the other direction I get stuck in what way to use the equality of images to get inyection. I can't see how to make a proof, in fact I can't associate the equality with the fact that there must be a unique preimage for every b\in B.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Try a proof by contradiction. Assume f is NOT injective. Can you construct two sets that violate the equality?
 


Thanks. I have not thought in that manner previously. Here is my proof of the implication I had problems with:

Let the equality is true. Suppose that f is not inyective. Then there exists b\in \Im f such that there are at least two x_{1},x_{2}\in A such that are preimages of b vía f.

Let C be the set of preimages of b with the exception of only one, and let D the set having the one missing in C. Then C\cap D=\emptyset and f(C)=f(D)=\{b\}\rightarrow f(C)\cap f(D)=\{b\}. But we have supposed that f(C\cap D)=f(C)\cap f(D), however the contention \emptyset\supset\{b\} is false by definition of empty set. Therefore f is inyective.
 


That looks ok. It might be a little clearer if you just say C={x1} and D={x2}.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K