I Intersection of a 4D line and a 3D polyhedron in 4D

AI Thread Summary
The intersection of a 4D line segment and a 3D polyhedron in 4D is indeed a point if they intersect, assuming they are not confined to the same 3D space. This conclusion aligns with the concept that a line in a higher dimension can intersect a lower-dimensional object at a single point. To prove this, one can analyze the situation using a coordinate system that aligns the 3D polyhedron with the axes. The reasoning parallels that of a line intersecting a plane in 3D, extended to an additional dimension. Thus, the intersection remains a singular point in 4D space.
LCDF
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Is the intersection of a 4D line segment and a 3D polyhedron in 4D a point in 4D, if they at all intersect? Intuitively, it looks like so. But I am not sure about it and how to prove it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If they are not in the same 3D space then the intersection will be a point. You can even use the full 3 D volume and a full line and it will still be a single point.

You can look at the line segment in a coordinate system where the 3D object is aligned with three axes, for example.
 
Thanks. Is there a mathematical proof for your observation? A hint would also work.
 
My second paragraph is a description how to get to a proof.

It's basically the same as with a plane and a line in 3D, just with one more coordinate.
 
  • Like
Likes LCDF

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Similar threads

Equator of a Planet with Four Spatial Dimensions is a 4D Torus
Replies
9
Views
4K
I A way to comprehend the geometry of a hypercube
Replies
2
Views
2K
Wrapping a 3D space wihtin a 4D space
Replies
4
Views
3K
I Round 3-sphere symmetries as subspace of 4D Euclidean space
Replies
7
Views
906
B What Is the Fourth Dimension and How Does It Work?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Perspective sketches from 4D to 3D?
Replies
2
Views
2K
B 4th spatial dimension thought experiment
Replies
8
Views
2K
Is the 4th Dimension More Than Just Time?
Replies
9
Views
3K
Map of a 4D planet
Replies
8
Views
1K
I Is it possible to apply Gauss' law to a Klein bottle?
Replies
1
Views
820

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top