Intersection of Sets Homework: Nonemptiness?

  • Thread starter Thread starter levicivita
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intersection Sets
levicivita
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



let A_{1}, A_{2}, ... be a sequence of subsets of R such that the intersection of the A_{1}, A_{2}, A_{3}..., A_{n} is nonempty for each n greater than/equal to 1. Does it follow that the intersection of all A_{n}'s is nonempty?
Does the answer change if you are given the extra information that each A_{n} is a closed interval, that is a set of the form [a_{n}, b_{n}] = {x member of R : a_{n} \leg x \leq b_{n} for some pair of real numbers (a_{n},b_{n}) with a_{n} < b_{n}

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I don't really have a clue how to start this. It seems to me that in both cases it should be non empty, but I'm really not sure. I'm not looking for some one to do this for me, because I want to be able to do it myself - I would appreciate it if someone could point me in the right direction without giving the game away.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first one, try to think of a counterexample. Perhaps try it for some sequence that converges to the empty set.

For the second part, you have a sequence of closed intervals such that the intersection of some finite collection of sets (in the sequence) is non empty. So what can you say about the intervals (think of them visually)?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top