Intertial mass and determining the value of gamma

  • Thread starter Thread starter daselocution
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gamma Mass Value
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the derivation of the gamma factor in relativistic momentum, specifically its form as (1-u^2/c^2)^-0.5. The individual is struggling to understand why the velocity squared changes from v^2 to u^2 in the context of Lorentz transformations. They seek clarification on the definitions of v and u, emphasizing that both should represent the relative velocity between two reference frames. The conversation highlights the need for a clearer explanation of these concepts to aid in understanding the underlying physics. A qualitative answer is requested to help bridge the knowledge gap.
daselocution
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is not a problem I was assigned, I am just trying to figure out how I could prove it to myself.

Basically, I am just wondering WHY the gamma value for relativistic momentum takes the form that it does, namely (1-u^2/c^2)^-.5

I've tried to prove this to myself a few times and I just cannot figure out how to do it. I am not sure if this is above my skill level and that is why I can't do it, as it was not addressed in my book nor was it addressed in my lecture. I tried to follow the same basic argument I used to show myself the value of gamma in the lorentz transformation, I just cannot figure out why the v^2 changes to u^2.

Even a qualitative answer would be helpful here.

Thanks a lot.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I just cannot figure out why the v^2 changes to u^2.
What are v and u in your derivation? That should be the same - the relative velocity between the two reference frames.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top