MHB Interval of eigenvalues using Gershgorin circles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the intervals of eigenvalues for the matrix A using Gershgorin circles. It is established that all eigenvalues must lie within the union of the row Gershgorin circles and the union of the column Gershgorin circles. The confusion arises regarding whether the eigenvalues should be found in the intersection of these unions or in the intersection of individual circles. The conclusion drawn is that the eigenvalues are indeed located in the intersection of the unions of row and column circles, as demonstrated through the provided visual representation. This analysis clarifies the relationship between the row and column Gershgorin circles in identifying eigenvalue locations.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

We have the matrix $$A=\begin{pmatrix}2 & 0.4 & -0.1 & 0.3 \\ 0.3 & 3 & -0.1 & 0.2 \\ 0 & 0.7 & 3 & 1 \\ 0.2 & 0.1 & 0 & 4\end{pmatrix}$$ We get the row Gershgorin circles: $$K_1=\{z\in \mathbb{C} : |z-2|\leq 0.8 \} \\ K_2=\{z\in \mathbb{C} : |z-3|\leq 0.6 \} \\ K_3=\{z\in \mathbb{C} : |z-3|\leq 1.7 \} \\ K_4=\{z\in \mathbb{C} : |z-4|\leq 0.3 \} $$ and the column Gershgorin circles: $$K_1'=\{z\in \mathbb{C} : |z-2|\leq 0.5 \} \\ K_2'=\{z\in \mathbb{C} : |z-3|\leq 1.2 \} \\ K_3'=\{z\in \mathbb{C} : |z-3|\leq 0.2 \} \\ K_4'=\{z\in \mathbb{C} : |z-4|\leq 1.5 \} $$

To get the intervals of the eigenvalues, we have to look at the union of all row circles and the union of all column circles, or not?

Then at the result we have to take the intersection, or not?

Till now I have seen only examples where $A=A^T$ and so the row and column circles are the same, and so I am confused here.

(Wondering)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
According to the wiki article, the way I see it, ALL the eigenvalues of $A$ must lie in
$$\displaystyle\cup_{i=1}^4K_i,$$
as you've defined them, AND ALL the eigenvalues of $A$ must lie in
$$\displaystyle\cup_{i=1}^4K_i'.$$
Therefore, all the eigenvalues of $A$ must lie in
$$\displaystyle\left(\cup_{i=1}^4K_i\right)\cap\left(\cup_{i=1}^4K_i'\right).$$
I don't think you can say that the eigenvalues must lie in
$$\cup_{i=1}^4(K_i\cap K_i'),$$
which is what I would be tempted to think, unless you can show those are equivalent.
 
Hey mathmari!

I have just read the wiki article about Gershgorin circles.
As I understand it, and this is verifiable from the proofs that are given in the article:
  • All eigenvalues are in the union of all row circles.
  • All eigenvalues are in the union of all column circles.
  • If the row circles can be divided into disjoint unions, then each disjoint union contains exactly as many eigenvalues as there are circles in it.
    Same for the column circles.
(Cool)

In this case there is a row circle that overlaps all other row circles.
And there is also a column circle that overlaps all others.
So I think the only thing we can say, is that all eigenvalues are in the intersection of the row-union and the column-union. (Thinking)
 
So this is what it looks like:
\begin{tikzpicture}
\newcommand{\coordinates}{
\draw[help lines] (0,-2) grid (6,2);
\draw[-stealth] (0,0) -- (6.4,0) node[label=Re]{};
\draw[stealth-stealth] (0,-2.3) -- (0,2.3) node[label=right:Im]{};
\draw[fill] foreach \i in {1,...,6} { (\i,0) node[yshift=-2cm,label=below:\i]{} };
\draw foreach \i in {-2,...,2} { (0,\i) node[label=left:\i]{} };
}

\newcommand{\rowcircles}{
(2,0) circle (0.8)
(3,0) circle (0.6)
circle (1.7)
(4,0) circle (0.3)
}
\newcommand{\colcircles}{
(2,0) circle (0.5)
(3,0) circle (1.2)
circle (0.2)
(4,0) circle (1.5)
}

\begin{scope}
\coordinates
\filldraw[red, fill opacity=.3] \rowcircles node[above left] at (2.3,1.4) {row circles};
\filldraw[blue, fill opacity=.3] \colcircles node[above right] at (4,1.4) {column circles};
\fill
(2,0) circle (1pt)
(3,0) circle (1pt)
(4,0) circle (1pt);
\end{scope}

\begin{scope}[xshift=8cm]
\coordinates
\clip\rowcircles;
\path[fill=red!50!blue, fill opacity=.6] \colcircles;
\draw (1.8617,0) circle (2pt)
(4.0368,0) circle (2pt)
(3.0508,0.2407) circle (2pt)
(3.0508,-0.2407) circle (2pt);
\end{scope}
\end{tikzpicture}
The small circles on the right are the actual eigenvalues. (Malthe)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
2
Replies
56
Views
10K
Replies
125
Views
19K
Back
Top