Interview with someone in Physics Field

StukaJU87c
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I am doing an interview paper on relating a sub-field of psychology to one's major. I am in my first year of pursuing a physics degree. The paper is on relating the human perception of time to time according to the theories of relativity. Anyway, the research portion of my paper turned out to take a lot more time to complete than originally thought and I am worried about professors being available for an interview before Thanksgiving. I need someone who will answer 10-15 questions for me.

Any help would be greatly appreciated

- Sorry just realized this is posted in the wrong section not sure if I should wait to be moved or repost?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might consider contacting professors in the psychology department at your university, or even faculty at other universities who specialize in human perception of time. You can also reach out to psychology professionals who are not affiliated with a university, such as psychologists or therapists who work in private practice. You can also find experts on the topic through online databases like Google Scholar, where you can find articles written by experts in the field. If you have difficulty finding someone who is available and willing to answer your questions, you could also try to find a professional who specializes in video interviews or phone interviews. Good luck with your project!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top