Introduction and theory on electropolishing

Thread starter dEEP6ix
Start date Sep 24, 2006
Tags

Introduction Theory

AI Thread Summary

Electropolishing is a process that enhances the surface finish of metals by removing a thin layer of material, resulting in a smoother and more polished surface. It is often used to improve corrosion resistance and cleanliness of metal components. Numerous online resources provide detailed information on the theory and applications of electropolishing, including academic papers and industry guides. For specific inquiries, it is recommended to consult these resources for comprehensive insights. Engaging with the wealth of available literature can significantly aid in understanding the electropolishing process for projects.

Sep 24, 2006

dEEP6ix

I urgently need some information like introduction and theory on electropolishing for my project. I have tried searching through the internet but to no avail. Does anyone by chance have some useful links that might aid me? Any help is greatly appreciated.

Physics news on Phys.org

Sep 24, 2006

turbo

Insights Author

Gold Member

Just use Google then come back if you have specific questions not covered by the thousands of references that you will find.

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...

View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

View full post »