Is there an opposite law to the law of greed in physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter deda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of the "law of greed," which suggests that those who have more tend to accumulate even more. This idea is compared to principles in physics, particularly the second law of thermodynamics, which states that heat flows from hot to cold, indicating that systems naturally move towards equilibrium. Participants debate the implications of these concepts, with one suggesting that instability in systems, like a spinning top, leads to a chaotic accumulation of energy until a collapse occurs. This analogy reflects the idea that entities with more resources or energy may become increasingly unstable, ultimately leading to a breakdown. The conversation highlights the parallels between human behavior and physical laws, emphasizing the dynamics of accumulation and instability.
deda
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
I'm sure that you're all familiar with the law of greed cause it's a part of the humman nature but I'll say it any way:
"The one that has more tends to have even more and he usually gets it". I wonder if there is an equivalent law to the law of greed in the domains of physics or if it applies in the same form? I'm sure that there is an oposite equivalent law and it's the 2nd principle of termodynamics, according to which:
"The object that has less heat cannot spontaneously give it away to an object with more heat"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by deda
I'm sure that you're all familiar with the law of greed cause it's a part of the humman nature but I'll say it any way:
"The one that has more tends to have even more and he usually gets it". I wonder if there is an equivalent law to the law of greed in the domains of physics or if it applies in the same form? I'm sure that there is an oposite equivalent law and it's the 2nd principle of termodynamics, according to which:
"The object that has less heat cannot spontaneously give it away to an object with more heat"

Heat spontaneously moves toward less heat; therefore, that which has more will have less. Which would be the opposite of what you stated.

Nautica
 
Perhaps it could have something to do with an unstable state? It gets more unstable and more unstable until it finaly collapses, the engergy being distributed in several parts that our produced from the collapse?
 
Originally posted by Sikz
Perhaps it could have something to do with an unstable state? It gets more unstable and more unstable until it finaly collapses, the engergy being distributed in several parts that our produced from the collapse?

you lost me

nautica
 
I was only observing that an unstable thing (atom, particle, etc) behaves in sort of that way (The one that has more tends to have even more and he usually gets it). It becomes more and more unstable, its energy being released more and more chaoticly and powerfully, until eventually it collapses.

A spinning top for instance- its wobbles continue to get bigger and more common, bigger and more common, bigger and more common, until finally it reaches the point where it can no longer function and it falls. This is similar to someone with a lot of things (energy) getting more and more (the chaotic realization of the energy).
 
Thread 'In the early days of electricity, they didn't have wall plugs'
Hello scientists, engineers, etc. I have not had any questions for you recently, so have not participated here. I was scanning some material and ran across these 2 ads. I had posted them at another forum, and I thought you may be interested in them as well. History is fascinating stuff! Some houses may have had plugs, but many homes just screwed the appliance into the light socket overhead. Does anyone know when electric wall plugs were in widespread use? 1906 ad DDTJRAC Even big...
Back
Top