MHB Introductory Algebra Percentage Word Problem

Larry2527
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The problem as given in the book:

The price of a dress is marked down 20% on May 1. On May 25th the reduced price is marked down an additional 15% to \$51. (a) What percent of the original price is the final sale price? (b) "What is the original price?

All I could think was trying to work the problem this way:

(a) 20% + 15% = 35% (total discount percentage)
100% - 35% = 65% (percent of the original price for a sale price of \$51)

(b) 65%x = \$51
x = 51/.65
x = \$78.46 (original price)

The answer given in the back of the book is given as (a) 68% and (b) \$75. Assuming the book's answer is correct, what am I missing?

- - - Updated - - -

Er, it posted all garbled for some reason. I have no idea why. Any ideas?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Larry2527 said:
The problem as given in the book:

The price of a dress is marked down 20% on May 1. On May 25th the reduced price is marked down an additional 15% to \$51. (a) What percent of the original price is the final sale price? (b) "What is the original price?

All I could think was trying to work the problem this way:

(a) 20% + 15% = 35% (total discount percentage)
100% - 35% = 65% (percent of the original price for a sale price of \$51)

(b) 65%x = \$51
x = 51/.65
x = \$78.46 (original price)

The answer given in the back of the book is given as (a) 68% and (b) \$75. Assuming the book's answer is correct, what am I missing?

Let $P$ be the original price.

first reduction to $0.80P$

second reduction to $0.85(0.80P) = 0.68P = 51 \implies P = 75$

the final price is 68% of $P = 75$

fyi, dollar signs activate the latex math type on this site. if you want to use one without doing so, put a backward slash \ prior to the dollar sign.
 
Larry2527 said:
The problem as given in the book:

The price of a dress is marked down 20% on May 1. On May 25th the reduced price is marked down an additional 15% to \$51. (a) What percent of the original price is the final sale price? (b) "What is the original price?

All I could think was trying to work the problem this way:

(a) 20% + 15% = 35% (total discount percentage)
There is your mistake! A percentage is always a percent of something (the "base" number). You cannot add these percentages because they are of different bases. The first is 20% of the original price. The second is 15% of that new price.

Let P be the original price. Then after the first mark down, the price is P'= P- 0.20P= 0.80P. After the second markdown, the price is P'- 0.15P'= 0.85P'= 0.85(0.80P)= 0.68P, or 68% of the original price, not 65%.

0.68P= 51 so P= 51/0.68

100% - 35% = 65% (percent of the original price for a sale price of \$51)

(b) 65%x = \$51
x = 51/.65
x = \$78.46 (original price)

The answer given in the back of the book is given as (a) 68% and (b) \$75. Assuming the book's answer is correct, what am I missing?

- - - Updated - - -

Er, it posted all garbled for some reason. I have no idea why. Any ideas?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Back
Top