Introductory books on quantum mechanics

mvillagra
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
The math part seems really interesting too, it is mainly based on linear operators on hilbert spaces. But, it seems to me that it only uses inner product (pre-hilbert) spaces, then why these authors (and also paper authors) refers always to hilbert spaces?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
mvillagra said:
The math part seems really interesting too, it is mainly based on linear operators on hilbert spaces. But, it seems to me that it only uses inner product (pre-hilbert) spaces, then why these authors (and also paper authors) refers always to hilbert spaces?


Convergence.

What does

1 = 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ...

mean?

It means that the sequence of partial sums converges to 1, i.e., has limit 1.

Much the same thing often is necessary in the state spaces of qauntum mechanical systems. See the third-last and second-last paragraphs on page 26 of Ballentine.
 
thank you very much for your answers, that was fast!

I will certaintly take a look at these tips!
 
mvillagra said:
thank you very much for your answers, that was fast!

I will certaintly take a look at these tips!

Welcome to Physics Forums mvillagra!

I split your post into two threads. The math/physics part remains here, and the book part has been moved to

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=309230

in the Science Book Discussion Forum.

Sorry for any confusion that this has caused.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top