Which Particle Physics Textbook is Better for a Master's Degree Student?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on selecting an experimental textbook for a master's degree in particle physics, specifically comparing "Introduction to High Energy Physics" by Perkins and "Particle Physics" by B.R. Martin & G. Shaw. The latter is noted for being comprehensive and suitable for self-study, with solutions provided for problems. However, a strong recommendation is made for Griffiths' "Introduction to Elementary Particles," praised for its clear explanations and inclusion of basic Quantum Field Theory, making it slightly more advanced but beneficial for understanding key concepts. The consensus suggests avoiding Perkins due to its perceived difficulty in learning. Additionally, Martin's book is highlighted for its up-to-date content.
welatiger
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Hi all;
I will work master's degree in particle physics and I want an experimental textbook for particle physics, and i have two choices

is "Introduction to high energy physics" by Perkins

or "particle physics" by B.R. Martin & G. Shaw

Can you advise me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't used Perkins myself so I can't say anything about it, but Martin&Shaw I've used. It is quite nice and often comprehensive and contains most of what you need on an introductory level (basic QM is probably all you will need). It also has solutions to all problems which is nice if you use it for self study.

However, I would instead recommend Griffiths "Introduction to Elementary Particles". It is better than the other in my opinion, better explanations of the concepts in the comprehensive style of Griffiths. It is a bit more advanced than the previous two (don't know about Perkins as I said) since it also introduces a basic form of Quantum Field Theory to be able to calculate cross sections, but it covers the same concepts (at least as Martin&Shaw).
 
thank you so much
i think that Martin's book advantage is it is up to date
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Back
Top