Intuition about derivative of x^2 at 0

Deter Pinklage

Homework Statement


So my problem is mainly intuitive one, in that this *feels* wrong, and am mostly looking for insight.

If we have uniform 1D motion of a particle along ##x## with constant velocity ##v##, what is the rate of change (first derivative with respect to time) of the variable ##x^2##, particularly when evaluated at ##t=0##?

Homework Equations


Well, pretty simply:
##\frac {d(x^2)}{dt} = 2v^2t##

The Attempt at a Solution


Now, I get that, but that would mean that at ##t=0##, ##x## is increasing at a rate of ##v##, whereas ##x^2## is not increasing at all. This confuses me because when you increase some positive number you must increase its square as well, right? Am I missing something obvious or something about the nature of infinitesimals?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like you've assumed ##x=vt##, so when ##t=0##, you have ##x=0##, which isn't a positive number. Does that clear up your confusion?
 
Right, of course, since when ##x## goes negative, ##x^2## will still have to increase so you got to have the local minimum. Idk why when you actually think about it physically it was weird. Thanks!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top