Intuition behind a method of adding two fractions

AI Thread Summary
To add two fractions, the numerators are multiplied by the opposite denominators, and the results are summed to form the new numerator, while the denominators are multiplied together to create the new denominator. This method effectively creates a common denominator, allowing for the fractions to be combined. The intuition behind this process is that fractions represent different "units," and to add them, they must be expressed in the same terms. The discussion illustrates this concept using relatable examples, such as comparing pie portions and converting measurements. Ultimately, understanding fractions as units helps clarify the addition process, making it less mysterious.
Juwane
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
One way to add two fractions is to multiply the numerators of both fractions with each other's denominator, then adding the two products, gives us the numerator of the final result. Then we multiply together the denominators of each other--this gives us the denominator of the final result.

Consider this example:

<br /> \frac{2}{3} + \frac{4}{5} = \frac{(5\times2)+(3\times4)}{(3\times5)} = \frac{22}{15}<br />

Why are we able to do that? I'm not looking for a rigorous proof, just the intuition behind it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To add fractions, they need the same denominator. We "change" the fractions to have a common denominator by the identity property x·1 = x and then simplify the result.
\frac{2}{3} + \frac{4}{5} = \frac{2}{3}\times\frac{5}{5} + \frac{4}{5}\times\frac{3}{3}

= \frac{2\times 5}{3\times 5} + \frac{4\times 3}{5\times 3} = \frac{(5\times 2) + (3\times 4)}{3\times 5}

I suppose the "intuition" is to make the denominators the same and then combine the fractions. What you have could be used as a formula for adding fractions, bypassing all the steps that lead up to that result.
 
This reminds me of something I told one of my friends a long time ago while driving down the highway. We saw a sign saying 3/4 mile to our exit. I mentioned to her, "there's only three quarter-miles to go." She thought about it for a second and was amused that she never thought of it as three "quarter miles." In her mind, it was always "three quarters" of a whole mile.

The nice thing is the two are interchangeable. Any hungry child will tell you that half a pie isn't the same as a third of a pie. But which is bigger? How do you compare halves and thirds? You convert each to an equal amount of sixths-pies. Then it's clear. If you cut a pie into 6 even pieces, you need to take 3 to have taken half the pie, so 1/2 = 3/6. And in the same way, you need 2/6 of a pie to equal that third-pie.

It's obvious with pie and pictures. But once you distill it to numbers, it does appear mysterious.
 
One way of thinking about it is that the denominators of fractions are really "units". That is, if we talk about "4 feet" or "3 yards", the "4" and "3" alone would be meaningless without specifying what units we are using. If we were to add those, we would NOT get "7" anything! We must have the same units. Here, it is simplest to change "3 yards" to 9 feet, since there are 3 yards to a foot. "4 feet plus 3 yards" is the same as "4 feet plus 9 feet= (4 + 9) feet= 13 feet.

Similarly, two add 2/3 plus 4/5, I need to get the same "units". One "third" is not any integer multiple of one "fifth" or vice versa but one "third" is 5 "fifteenths" so 2 "thirds" is 10 "fifteenths" and one "fifth" is 3 "fifteenths" so 4 "fifths" is 12 "fifteenths".

2 thirds plus 4 fifths= 10 fifteenths plust 12 fifteenths= 22 fifteenths.
2/3+ 4/5= 10/15+ 12/15= 22/15.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top