Intuition for Capacitor placed in parrallel or in series

AI Thread Summary
Capacitors add normally when placed in parallel because they share the same voltage across their plates, leading to the equation C = C1 + C2 + C3. In contrast, when capacitors are in series, they share the same current, resulting in the reciprocal relationship 1/C = 1/C1 + 1/C2 + 1/C3. The discussion clarifies that while the plates of a single capacitor do not share voltage, the voltage across each capacitor in series remains consistent. The charges on opposite plates of each capacitor are equal and opposite, adhering to the conservation of charge. This understanding reinforces the fundamental principles of capacitor behavior in different configurations.
Genericcoder
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I just want to make sure my intuition is correct for why capacitors add normally when placed in parrallel and add reciprocally when placed in series.


In parrallel they add normally for example

C = C1 + C2 + C3;
Because when placed in parrallel the right hand plate share same Voltage as left hand plate,so the charge acquired would be
CV = C1V + C2V + C3V + C4V;
C = C1 + C2 + C3 + C4;

When you place them in series take 3 capacitors C1,C2,C3 where C1 is on the left C2 is in the middle and C3 is on the right handside.

So when you place them in the circuit C1 will acquire a positive charge so C3 will also acquire negative charge,and since they are neutral their will be also a negative charge on left side of C3,and Positive and negative on the right of C2 and on the left of C2;


So they all share same current:-

Q / C = Q/C1 + Q/C2 + Q/C3;
1/C = 1/C1 + 1/C2 + 1/C3;

I just want to make sure that this intuition is correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Genericcoder! :wink:
Genericcoder said:
… when placed in parrallel the right hand plate share same Voltage as left hand plate,so the charge acquired would be
CV = C1V + C2V + C3V + C4V;
C = C1 + C2 + C3 + C4;

When you place them in series … they all share same current:-

Q / C = Q/C1 + Q/C2 + Q/C3;
1/C = 1/C1 + 1/C2 + 1/C3

Your equations are completely correct. :smile:

But your understanding of what happens across the plates is suspect …

the plates of a single capacitor do not "share" a voltage, on the contrary they have a voltage difference

the three right-hand plates do share a voltage, and so do the three left-hand plates, and so the voltage across each capacitor is the same.
So when you place them in the circuit C1 will acquire a positive charge so C3 will also acquire negative charge,and since they are neutral their will be also a negative charge on left side of C3,and Positive and negative on the right of C2 and on the left of C2

This is an odd way of putting it …

a more obvious way is to say that the charges on opposite plates of each capacitor will be equal and opposite, and by conservation of charge so are the charges on adjacent plates of each pair of capacitors.
 
Thanks that makes sense :).
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top