Intuitive understanding of friis formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter sriecewit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the intuitive understanding of the Friis formula and its application in noise figure analysis of amplifier circuits. It highlights that the placement of a Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) significantly affects the overall noise figure due to the amplification of noise from previous stages. The Friis formula is primarily concerned with transmitter and receiver performance, emphasizing the impact of distance and antenna gain on signal loss. Participants clarify that the first stage of amplification is crucial, as noise is uncorrelated and cannot be removed once amplified. Ultimately, the placement of the LNA is critical for optimizing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in a system.
sriecewit
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys,

Can anyone help me with the intuitive understanding of the friis formula?

I'm not able to contemplate the fact that when you put LNA in the front-end of a circuit, overall noise figure is less.
The same hardware, you put it after a few circuitry, the noise figure goes up.

How can the same component cause so much change in noise characteristics of a system when you change its position?

Thanks,
Srini
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Wrong answer to wrong thread

Friis is about transmitters/receivers and not noise in amplifier chains. Two different things.

In Friis, you have 1/4pi R2, which should scream out the obvious: solid angle at a distance. That with antenna gain should be pretty clear: 1/R2 losses with antenna performance.

A amplifier chain is only as quiet/non-noisy as the first stage because noise is uncorrelated so you can't magically remove it once it's there so you will be simply amplifying the noise and the signal after the first stage. So the SNR has to be on the first stage or the LNA goes first.
 
No changes
 
Last edited:
Quick comment,
The LNA will amplify everything coming from previous stages, including noise generated in previous stages.
 
jambaugh said:
Quick comment,
The LNA will amplify everything coming from previous stages, including noise generated in previous stages.
yeah. So practically speaking, does it really matter if you put it in the beginning or later? Its the same hardware and same signal flowing. So you would eventually get the similar signal output right? I'm still not convinced with the mathematics of friis formula.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top