Intuitive understanding of friis formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter sriecewit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the intuitive understanding of the Friis formula and its application in noise figure analysis of amplifier circuits. It highlights that the placement of a Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) significantly affects the overall noise figure due to the amplification of noise from previous stages. The Friis formula is primarily concerned with transmitter and receiver performance, emphasizing the impact of distance and antenna gain on signal loss. Participants clarify that the first stage of amplification is crucial, as noise is uncorrelated and cannot be removed once amplified. Ultimately, the placement of the LNA is critical for optimizing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in a system.
sriecewit
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys,

Can anyone help me with the intuitive understanding of the friis formula?

I'm not able to contemplate the fact that when you put LNA in the front-end of a circuit, overall noise figure is less.
The same hardware, you put it after a few circuitry, the noise figure goes up.

How can the same component cause so much change in noise characteristics of a system when you change its position?

Thanks,
Srini
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Wrong answer to wrong thread

Friis is about transmitters/receivers and not noise in amplifier chains. Two different things.

In Friis, you have 1/4pi R2, which should scream out the obvious: solid angle at a distance. That with antenna gain should be pretty clear: 1/R2 losses with antenna performance.

A amplifier chain is only as quiet/non-noisy as the first stage because noise is uncorrelated so you can't magically remove it once it's there so you will be simply amplifying the noise and the signal after the first stage. So the SNR has to be on the first stage or the LNA goes first.
 
No changes
 
Last edited:
Quick comment,
The LNA will amplify everything coming from previous stages, including noise generated in previous stages.
 
jambaugh said:
Quick comment,
The LNA will amplify everything coming from previous stages, including noise generated in previous stages.
yeah. So practically speaking, does it really matter if you put it in the beginning or later? Its the same hardware and same signal flowing. So you would eventually get the similar signal output right? I'm still not convinced with the mathematics of friis formula.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top