Inverse Beta Decay: Can Free Protons Change to Neutrons?

Dadface
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
105
With this mechanism a nuclear proton can capture an inner orbit electron and change to a neutron with the emisssion of a neutrino.Can this mechanism also operate with free protons if ,say, bombarded by free electrons?I have tried researching this but have found no reference other than a Wiki article which claims that free protons cannot normally be changed to free neutrons by the process of electron capture.To me this implies that it can happen but that such events are rarely observed,possibly due to energy considerations.I will be grateful if someone could clarify this for me and if possible provide a reference.Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Beta decay of a neutron obtains three particles: proton, electron and an electron neutrino (antineutrino?)

In any case, the reverse reaction for a free proton would require the happenstance of the proton meeting up with an electron and a neutrino at the same time, in just the right way so that all the requisite conservation laws are met. This is what is meant by "not normally".
 
The reaction e^{-} + p \rightarrow \nu_e + n is possible, but I would be suprised if it's actually been detected because of the obvious technical difficulty of detecting two neutral particles in the final state.
 
Last edited:
Thank you Phrak and jtbell.So it seems that such events may be unlikely and difficult to detect but are theoretically possible.I think energy plays a major part in the event because it seems likely free protons and free electrons at "low" KE values will readily come together to form hydrogen atoms.Also ,if any free neutrons are produced these will be unstable and decay into protons electrons and anti neutrinos.
 
This is how we make neutron stars right.
 
I'm something of a novice at particle Physics; can someone explain to me the conditions and instance of neutrino production? I think they're neutral particles with no mass and near-light speed but I'm not sure...The wikipedia article seems to be somehwat ambiguous on this topic.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top