Inverse Fourier transform of ## \frac{1}{a+jw} ##

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the inverse Fourier transform of the function \( \frac{1}{a+jw} \), where \( a \) is a positive real constant. Participants are exploring the definitions and properties of Fourier transforms and their inverses, particularly in the context of a function defined with the Heaviside step function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to calculate the inverse Fourier transform of \( \frac{1}{a+jw} \) and express their difficulties with the integral involved. Questions arise regarding the necessity of calculating the inverse transform and the methods available, including contour integration.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of the integral and suggested that contour integration may be a viable approach, although not all participants are familiar with this technique. The discussion reflects a mix of attempts to clarify understanding and explore different methods without reaching a consensus on a solution.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of traditional notation preferences, with a focus on using the Greek letter omega \( \omega \) instead of \( w \). Additionally, participants express varying levels of familiarity with contour integration, which may impact their ability to proceed with the problem.

etf
Messages
179
Reaction score
2
Fourier transform is defined as
$$F(jw)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(t)e^{-jwt}dt.$$
Inverse Fourier transform is defined as
$$f(t)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}F(jw)e^{jwt}dw.$$

Let ##f(t)=e^{-at}h(t),a>0##, where ##h(t)## is heaviside function and ##a## is real constant.

Fourier transform of this function is
$$F(jw)=\int_{0}^{\infty}f(t)e^{-jwt}dt=\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-at}e^{-jwt}dt=\frac{1}{a+jw}$$
How can I calculate inverse Fourier transform of ##\frac{1}{a+jw}##, ##f(t)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{a+jw}e^{jwt}dw##?
Although ##\frac{1}{a+jw}## doesn't look complicated, there is no way I can calculate this integral. Generaly, I have problems calculating inverse FT. Any suggestion?
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
etf said:
Fourier transform is defined as
$$F(jw)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(t)e^{-jwt}dt.$$
Inverse Fourier transform is defined as
$$f(t)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}F(jw)e^{jwt}dw.$$

Let ##f(t)=e^{-at}h(t),a>0##, where ##h(t)## is heaviside function and ##a## is real constant.

Fourier transform of this function is
$$F(jw)=\int_{0}^{\infty}f(t)e^{-jwt}dt=\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-at}e^{-jwt}dt=\frac{1}{a+jw}$$
How can I calculate inverse Fourier transform of ##\frac{1}{a+jw}##, ##f(t)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{a+jw}e^{jwt}dw##?
Although ##\frac{1}{a+jw}## doesn't look complicated, there is no way I can calculate this integral. Generaly, I have problems calculating inverse FT. Any suggestion?
Thanks in advance.

What is the reason you want to calculate the inverse FT of your ##F(\omega)##? [BTW: it should be called ##F(\omega)##, not ##F(i \omega)## or ##F(j \omega)##.] You already know how you obtained ##F## from your original function ##f(t)=e^{-at}h(t)##. Are you just trying to practice, to see if you can do the integral and get back your ##f(t)##, or are you fundamentally misunderstanding something about about the subject?
 
Last edited:
etf said:
Fourier transform is defined as
$$F(jw)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(t)e^{-jwt}dt.$$
It's traditional to use the Greek letter omega, ##\omega##, not ##w##. (I hope you don't say "double-u" when you're talking to others, especially your instructor.)

How can I calculate inverse Fourier transform of ##\frac{1}{a+jw}##, ##f(t)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{a+jw}e^{jwt}dw##? Although ##\frac{1}{a+jw}## doesn't look complicated, there is no way I can calculate this integral. Generaly, I have problems calculating inverse FT. Any suggestion?
It's straightforward to calculate that integral if you know how to do contour integration in the complex plane. I'm guessing you probably haven't seen that yet.
 
Ray Vickson said:
What is the reason you want to calculate the inverse FT of your ##F(\omega)##? [BTW: it should be called ##F(\omega)##, not ##F(i \omega)## or ##F(j \omega)##.] You already know how you obtained ##F## from your original function ##f(t)=e^{-at}h(t)##. Are you just trying to practice, to see if you can do the integral and get back your ##f(t)##, or are you fundamentally misunderstanding something about about the subject?

I'm just trying to practice...

vela said:
It's traditional to use the Greek letter omega, ##\omega##, not ##w##. (I hope you don't say "double-u" when you're talking to others, especially your instructor.)It's straightforward to calculate that integral if you know how to do contour integration in the complex plane. I'm guessing you probably haven't seen that yet.

I know it's omega, just didn't write it :)
I'm not familiar with contour integration yet, but I would like to see solution...
 
The idea is to consider the integral along the real axis as part of a closed contour in the complex plane. The rest of the contour doesn't contribute to the integral, so you have
$$\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{1}{a+i\omega} e^{i\omega t}\,d\omega = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_C \frac{1}{a+iz} e^{izt}\,dz.$$ The latter integral can be evaluated using the residue theorem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etf

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K