Inverse Laplace transform for 1/(350+s) * X(s)

DinaZhang1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, everyone, the question is as below:

Find the inverse Laplace transform to 1/(350+s) * X(s). 's' is the Laplace variable and 'X(s)' is also a variable.

I inverted 1/(350+s) and X(s) separately and multiplied them together directly. But this seems not giving me the correct answer. Could anyone help me on this?

Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
DinaZhang1 said:
Hi, everyone, the question is as below:

Find the inverse Laplace transform to 1/(350+s) * X(s). 's' is the Laplace variable and 'X(s)' is also a variable.


I inverted 1/(350+s) and X(s) separately and multiplied them together directly. But this seems not giving me the correct answer. Could anyone help me on this?

Thank you.

Multiplication won't work; you need convolution.

If ##f(t) \leftrightarrow F(s)## and ##g(t) \leftrightarrow G(s)##, then ##F(s) G(s)## is the Laplace transform of the convolution ##f*g##, where
$$(f * g)(x) = \int_0^{\infty} f(y) g(x-y) \, dy = \int_0^{\infty} f(x-y) g(y) \, dy .$$
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top