Inverse Laplace Transform of F(ks)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jhenrique
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laplace
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around computing the inverse Laplace transform of the function F(ks). Participants are exploring the implications of the transformation, particularly focusing on the role of the absolute value of k in the context of the inverse Laplace transform.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to derive the inverse Laplace transform and question the necessity of the absolute value of k. There is also a reference to the definition of the Laplace transform and its properties, prompting further exploration of the relationship between the Laplace and Fourier transforms.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes confirmations of correctness regarding the inverse Laplace transform attempts. Some participants express confusion about earlier statements, indicating a dynamic exchange of ideas and clarifications without reaching a definitive consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of assumptions regarding the behavior of the function f(x) for x<0, which may influence the discussion on the transforms being considered.

Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Compute the inverse laplace transform of F(ks)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



$$L^{-1} (F(ks)) = \frac{f}{|k|} \left( \frac{t}{k} \right)$$

Correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jhenrique said:

Homework Statement


Compute the inverse laplace transform of F(ks)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



$$L^{-1} (F(ks)) = \frac{f}{|k|} \left( \frac{t}{k} \right)$$

Correct?
Why do you think you need the absolute value of k?

What do you get from ##\mathcal{L}(f(t/k))##, using the definition?
 
You could just the fact that ##\mathscr{F}[f](\lambda)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\mathscr{L}[f](i\lambda)## if we assume that ##f(x)=0## for ##x<0##.

Where the Fourier Transform is the following ##\mathscr{F}[f](\lambda)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)e^{-ix\lambda}dx##

It should now be clearly what the inverse Laplace transform of the Fourier transform of a function is.
 
I did a simple question. I hoped a yes or not...
 
Your answer is correct. Sorry about earlier, I mistook the F to be the Fourier transform.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
xiavatar said:
Your answer is correct. Sorry about earlier, I mistook the F to be the Fourier transform.

Ok, thankyou!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K