How can I calculate the inverse of a 4th order tensor?

In summary, the conversation discussed how to calculate the inverse of a 4th order tensor. It involved choosing a basis for the rank 2 tensor space, expressing the components of the rank 4 tensor in that basis, and using standard matrix inversion techniques to find the inverse. The conversation also mentioned that in elasticity, a fourth order tensor may possess minor symmetry, making the matrix singular. In this case, the inverse can still be calculated for a modulus tensor.
  • #1
Galbi
12
0

Homework Statement


I'm looking for how to calculate inverse of the 4th order tensor. That is,
A:A-1=A-1:A=I(4)
If I know a fourth order tensor A, then how can I calculate A-1 ?
Let's just say it is inversible.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
By "fourth order" I presume you mean rank 4, but that is with regard to the original vector space. A tensor is also a "Vector" in its own vector space as well as a linear operator in several settings but you seem to be implying a double contraction wherein you are mapping rank 2 tensors to rank 2 tensors.

Your task then is to write down a basis for the rank 2 tensor space upon which the rank 4 tensor acts and express that rank 4 tensor's components in that basis in the form of a matrix. You then use the standard matrix inversion techniques to find its inverse.

Example for 2 dimensional vectors you would choose as a basis for your rank 2 space say,[itex] e^{11},e^{12},e^{21},e^{22}[/itex] where [itex] e^{ij}=e^i\otimes e^j[/itex]. Then the rank 4 tensor has matrix form:
[tex]A=\left[\begin{array}{cccc} A_{1111} & A_{1112} & A_{1121} & A_{1122} \\
A_{1211} & A_{1212} & A_{1221} & A_{1222} \\
A_{2111} & A_{2112} & A_{2121} & A_{2122} \\
A_{2211} & A_{2212} & A_{2221} & A_{2222}
\end{array}\right][/tex]

Invert that matrix and you have the "inverse" in the same basis.
 
  • #3
Thank you very much.
Since I'm a novice at tensor calculation, It's hard to understand what you're saying.

If I have 3x3x3x3 tensors, then do the components of inversion of the matrix as seen below correspond to the components of inverse of A ?

[tex]A=\left[\begin{array}{cccc} A_{1111} & A_{1112} & A_{1113} & A_{1121}& A_{1122}& A_{1123}& A_{1131}& A_{1132}& A_{1133} \\
A_{1211} & A_{1212} & A_{1213} & A_{1221}& A_{1222}& A_{1223}& A_{1231}& A_{1232}& A_{1233} \\
A_{1311} & A_{1312} & A_{1313} & A_{1321}& A_{1322}& A_{1323}& A_{1331}& A_{1332}& A_{1333} \\
A_{2111} & A_{2112} & A_{2113} & A_{2121}& A_{2122}& A_{2123}& A_{2131}& A_{2132}& A_{2133} \\
A_{2211} & A_{2212} & A_{2213} & A_{2221}& A_{2222}& A_{2223}& A_{2231}& A_{2232}& A_{2233} \\
A_{2311} & A_{2312} & A_{2313} & A_{2321}& A_{2322}& A_{2323}& A_{2331}& A_{2332}& A_{2333} \\
A_{3111} & A_{3112} & A_{3113} & A_{3121}& A_{3122}& A_{3123}& A_{3131}& A_{3132}& A_{3133} \\
A_{3211} & A_{3212} & A_{3213} & A_{3221}& A_{3222}& A_{3223}& A_{3231}& A_{3232}& A_{3233} \\
A_{3311} & A_{3312} & A_{3213} & A_{3321}& A_{3322}& A_{3323}& A_{3331}& A_{3332}& A_{3333} \\
\end{array}\right][/tex]I'm going to check this with MATLAB now.
Thank you again!

jambaugh said:
By "fourth order" I presume you mean rank 4, but that is with regard to the original vector space. A tensor is also a "Vector" in its own vector space as well as a linear operator in several settings but you seem to be implying a double contraction wherein you are mapping rank 2 tensors to rank 2 tensors.

Your task then is to write down a basis for the rank 2 tensor space upon which the rank 4 tensor acts and express that rank 4 tensor's components in that basis in the form of a matrix. You then use the standard matrix inversion techniques to find its inverse.

Example for 2 dimensional vectors you would choose as a basis for your rank 2 space say,[itex] e^{11},e^{12},e^{21},e^{22}[/itex] where [itex] e^{ij}=e^i\otimes e^j[/itex]. Then the rank 4 tensor has matrix form:
[tex]A=\left[\begin{array}{cccc} A_{1111} & A_{1112} & A_{1121} & A_{1122} \\
A_{1211} & A_{1212} & A_{1221} & A_{1222} \\
A_{2111} & A_{2112} & A_{2121} & A_{2122} \\
A_{2211} & A_{2212} & A_{2221} & A_{2222}
\end{array}\right][/tex]

Invert that matrix and you have the "inverse" in the same basis.
 
  • #4
Dear jambaugh,

It works! Thank you very much!

jambaugh said:
By "fourth order" I presume you mean rank 4, but that is with regard to the original vector space. A tensor is also a "Vector" in its own vector space as well as a linear operator in several settings but you seem to be implying a double contraction wherein you are mapping rank 2 tensors to rank 2 tensors.

Your task then is to write down a basis for the rank 2 tensor space upon which the rank 4 tensor acts and express that rank 4 tensor's components in that basis in the form of a matrix. You then use the standard matrix inversion techniques to find its inverse.

Example for 2 dimensional vectors you would choose as a basis for your rank 2 space say,[itex] e^{11},e^{12},e^{21},e^{22}[/itex] where [itex] e^{ij}=e^i\otimes e^j[/itex]. Then the rank 4 tensor has matrix form:
[tex]A=\left[\begin{array}{cccc} A_{1111} & A_{1112} & A_{1121} & A_{1122} \\
A_{1211} & A_{1212} & A_{1221} & A_{1222} \\
A_{2111} & A_{2112} & A_{2121} & A_{2122} \\
A_{2211} & A_{2212} & A_{2221} & A_{2222}
\end{array}\right][/tex]

Invert that matrix and you have the "inverse" in the same basis.
 
  • #5
jambaugh said:
By "fourth order" I presume you mean rank 4, but that is with regard to the original vector space. A tensor is also a "Vector" in its own vector space as well as a linear operator in several settings but you seem to be implying a double contraction wherein you are mapping rank 2 tensors to rank 2 tensors.

Your task then is to write down a basis for the rank 2 tensor space upon which the rank 4 tensor acts and express that rank 4 tensor's components in that basis in the form of a matrix. You then use the standard matrix inversion techniques to find its inverse.

Example for 2 dimensional vectors you would choose as a basis for your rank 2 space say,[itex] e^{11},e^{12},e^{21},e^{22}[/itex] where [itex] e^{ij}=e^i\otimes e^j[/itex]. Then the rank 4 tensor has matrix form:
[tex]A=\left[\begin{array}{cccc} A_{1111} & A_{1112} & A_{1121} & A_{1122} \\
A_{1211} & A_{1212} & A_{1221} & A_{1222} \\
A_{2111} & A_{2112} & A_{2121} & A_{2122} \\
A_{2211} & A_{2212} & A_{2221} & A_{2222}
\end{array}\right][/tex]

Invert that matrix and you have the "inverse" in the same basis.

Hi jambaugh,

Your anwser is quite inspiring, though I do encounter other questions when applying your solution.

It's quite common in elasticity for a fourth order tensor to possesses minor symmetry, i.e. [tex]A_{ijkl}=A_{ijlk}=A_{jikl}[/tex]
In this case, the matrix you mentioned would be singular, while the corresponding tensor (e.g. a modulus tensor) do have an inverse (e.g. a compliance tensor).

Could you shed some light on calculating the inverse of a modulus tensor?
 
  • #6
Note that by construction the strain tensor also has this index symmetry and so too the stress tensor.
I suggest you conceptualize the pairs as a single multi-index:
[tex] Y_{(ij)} = \sum_{(kl)} A_{(ij),(kl)} X_{(kl)}[/tex]
One needs to be careful with definitions here as there may be factor of two differences in how you express the tensor since I am here suggesting only summing over redundant indices once.
The summation over a symmetric pair here would count e.g. (12) and (21) as one value.
In this format there are six unique terms in the sum: (11)(12)(13)(22)(23)(33) (for 3 dimensions)
So A is effectively expressed as a 6x6 matrix instead of as a 9x9. It is here where true singularities which forbid inverting the defined mapping would occur.

The factor of two I mentioned occurs where equal indices occur once in both 9x9 and 6x6 representations while the unequal ones occur only once in the 6x6 but twice in the 9x9.

I'm not sure of the application and the nature of the singularity you mention. I've just played a lot with irreducible linear representations of GL(N) which is what "tensors" ultimately are. But I hope this observation is helpful.
 

1. What is a 4th order tensor?

A 4th order tensor is a mathematical object that has 4 indices and can be represented by a 4-dimensional array. It is used to describe the relationship between two sets of vectors or tensors in multidimensional space.

2. What is the inverse of a 4th order tensor?

The inverse of a 4th order tensor is a tensor that, when multiplied with the original tensor, results in the identity tensor. It can be thought of as the "reciprocal" of the original tensor.

3. How is the inverse of a 4th order tensor calculated?

The inverse of a 4th order tensor can be calculated using various methods, depending on the specific properties of the tensor. One common method is the use of matrix inversion, where the tensor is converted into a matrix and then inverted using standard matrix inversion techniques.

4. What are the applications of the inverse of a 4th order tensor?

The inverse of a 4th order tensor has various applications in physics, engineering, and mathematics. It is used in the study of fluid dynamics, electromagnetism, and elasticity, among others. It is also used in the development of computational models for complex systems.

5. Are there any limitations to using the inverse of a 4th order tensor?

Yes, there are limitations to using the inverse of a 4th order tensor. One limitation is that the inverse may not exist for certain tensors, such as those with zero determinants. Additionally, the calculation of the inverse can be computationally intensive, making it difficult to use in some applications.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
129
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
95
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
2
Views
515
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
571
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
818
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
Back
Top