Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Inverting parabolic and stereographic coordinates

  1. Mar 1, 2008 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Given the parabolic co-ordinate system defined, given Cartesian coordinates x and y, as
    [tex]$\lambda = x^2-y^2,$[/tex]
    find the inverse transformation [tex]x(\mu, \lambda)[/tex] and [tex]y(\mu,\lambda)[/tex].

    2. Relevant equations


    3. The attempt at a solution

    We compute [tex]\lambda/\mu^2[/tex] in order to obtain
    [tex]x=\pm \sqrt{\frac{\lambda\pm\sqrt{\lambda^2+1}}2}[/tex]
    [tex]y=\frac{2\mu}{\pm \sqrt{\frac{\lambda\pm\sqrt{\lambda^2+1}}2}}[/tex]

    However, I don't think this is right ... I'm following a set of CM lecture notes, which immediately go on to claim [tex]x^2+y^2=\lambda^2+\mu^2[/tex] and
    [tex]\dot x^2 + \dot y^2 = \frac14 \frac{\dot \lambda^2 + \dot \mu^2}{\sqrt{\lambda^2 + \mu^2}} [/tex]
    which looks tantalizingly similar to spherical polars, but doesn't seem to follow from what I have ...

    Any thoughts on inverting general "nonlinear" co-ordinate systems (other than cylindrical and spherical)? What about finding the inverse transformation for the stereographic projection defined by
    [tex]\frac{x}{\xi} = \frac{y}{\eta} = \frac1{1-\zeta}[/tex]

    so that [tex]x=\frac{\xi}{1-\zeta}; y=\frac{\eta}{1-\zeta} [/tex]?

    It's hard to get rid of the "old" set of variables in this case.
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 1, 2008 #2
    If you want to find x and y in terms of [tex]\lambda[/tex] and [tex]\mu[/tex], then youre given [tex]\mu=2xy[/tex]


    Substitute this in the other equation and solve for x. Similarly for y.
    Last edited: Mar 1, 2008
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook