Inverting parabolic and stereographic coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on inverting parabolic coordinates defined by the equations $\mu=2xy$ and $\lambda=x^2-y^2$ to find the inverse transformations for x and y in terms of $\mu$ and $\lambda$. The derived equations are x = ±√(λ±√(λ²+1)/2) and y = 2μ/±√(λ±√(λ²+1)/2). Additionally, the conversation explores the inverse transformation for stereographic projection given by x = ξ/(1−ζ) and y = η/(1−ζ). The relationship x² + y² = λ² + μ² is noted, suggesting a connection to spherical coordinates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parabolic coordinate systems
  • Familiarity with stereographic projections
  • Knowledge of inverse transformations in coordinate systems
  • Basic calculus and algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of inverse transformations in parabolic coordinates
  • Research stereographic projection and its applications in geometry
  • Learn about nonlinear coordinate systems and their inversions
  • Explore the relationship between different coordinate systems, including spherical and cylindrical coordinates
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in advanced coordinate transformations and their applications in theoretical physics and geometry.

Epimetheus
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the parabolic co-ordinate system defined, given Cartesian coordinates x and y, as
[tex]$\mu=2xy$[/tex]
[tex]$\lambda = x^2-y^2,$[/tex]
find the inverse transformation [tex]x(\mu, \lambda)[/tex] and [tex]y(\mu,\lambda)[/tex].

Homework Equations



None

The Attempt at a Solution



We compute [tex]\lambda/\mu^2[/tex] in order to obtain
[tex]x=\pm \sqrt{\frac{\lambda\pm\sqrt{\lambda^2+1}}2}[/tex]
and
[tex]y=\frac{2\mu}{\pm \sqrt{\frac{\lambda\pm\sqrt{\lambda^2+1}}2}}[/tex]

However, I don't think this is right ... I'm following a set of CM lecture notes, which immediately go on to claim [tex]x^2+y^2=\lambda^2+\mu^2[/tex] and
[tex]\dot x^2 + \dot y^2 = \frac14 \frac{\dot \lambda^2 + \dot \mu^2}{\sqrt{\lambda^2 + \mu^2}}[/tex]
which looks tantalizingly similar to spherical polars, but doesn't seem to follow from what I have ...

Any thoughts on inverting general "nonlinear" co-ordinate systems (other than cylindrical and spherical)? What about finding the inverse transformation for the stereographic projection defined by
[tex]\frac{x}{\xi} = \frac{y}{\eta} = \frac1{1-\zeta}[/tex]

so that [tex]x=\frac{\xi}{1-\zeta}; y=\frac{\eta}{1-\zeta}[/tex]?

It's hard to get rid of the "old" set of variables in this case.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to find x and y in terms of [tex]\lambda[/tex] and [tex]\mu[/tex], then youre given [tex]\mu=2xy[/tex]

[tex]y=\frac{\mu}{2x}[/tex].

Substitute this in the other equation and solve for x. Similarly for y.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K