Investigating Energy Conservation with Sinusoidal Waves

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the addition of two sinusoidal waves, y1 and y2, and the implications of their superposition. When the phase difference (phi) equals pi, the waves cancel each other out, resulting in zero amplitude and raising questions about energy conservation. It is clarified that energy is not lost but instead transferred to the source of the second wave, as destructive interference occurs. The conversation emphasizes that the overall energy of the system is a combination of both waves, rather than the energy of a single wave component. Understanding this principle is crucial for grasping wave interactions and energy dynamics in wave systems.
landaetaedwar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi there. I am having trouble finding an explanation with waves.

Suppose that you have to sinusoidal waves
y1=Asin(kx-wt) and y2=Asin(kx-wt+phi)
If we add them up, the resulting wave will be y=2Acos(phi/2)sin(kx-wt+phi/2). Now, if phi equals pi then the resulting wave will have no amplitude.
We know that in order to cause both waves energy is needed, and that energy is proportional to the square of the amplitude.
I cannot find to explain what happens to the energy. Where does it go? Wouldn't this violate the principle of the energy conservation?

I appreciate any help
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just how would you 'add them up' ?
 
Destructive interference occurs (superposition)
 
If they are both going in the same direction, then one wave was present when the second wave was created, which means whatever caused it had to do work against the first wave. So, the energy went into whatever was making the second wave.
 
Notice that for phi=pi, you just have y1=Asin(kx-wt) and y2=-Asin(kx-wt). So y1+y2=0 and you actually don't have a wave any longer.

The punchline is that you cannot choose whether or not to add up the waves. If two independent waves are both solutions for the same system, then the general solution of that system will be the sum of both waves. To put it differently, the "energy" of a single wave component is not the true energy of the system, which should be a combination of both waves.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top