What is the pH of a 0.085 M solution of a weak base that is 1.6% ionized?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fragment
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ionization
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the pH of a 0.085 M solution of a weak base that is 1.6% ionized, the hydroxide ion concentration is determined using the formula for percent ionization. The calculation shows that [OH-] equals 0.136 M, leading to a pOH of 0.866. The final pH is then calculated as 13.134 by subtracting the pOH from 14. The discussion highlights a common error in calculations, emphasizing the importance of double-checking math in chemistry problems. Overall, the thread illustrates the process of determining pH for weak bases and the potential for simple mistakes.
Fragment
Messages
149
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



A 0.085 M aqueous solution of a weak base is known to be 1.6 percent ionized. Calculate the pH of the solution.

Homework Equations



%Ionization= ([OH-] derived from base/ initial [base]) x 100%
pOH=-log[OH-}

The Attempt at a Solution



%Ionization= ([OH-] derived from base/ initial [base]) x 100%
1.6%=[OH]/0.085M
[OH]=0.136M

pOH=-log[OH-]
pOH=-log(o.136M)
pOH=0.866
pH+pOH=14, 14-0.866=13.134...

I normally do these without a problem, so I'm assuming it's a stupid mistake. The problem clearly says weak base...Where am I going wrong?

Regards,
Fragment
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fragment said:
%Ionization= ([OH-] derived from base/ initial [base]) x 100%
1.6%=[OH]/0.085M
[OH]=0.136M

Check your math. You are right - it is a stupid mistake. Not that uncommon though.
 
Hahaha, I even double checked it the other night. How lame. Thanks:redface:
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top