News Iraqi unrest, Syrian unrest, and ISIS/ISIL/Daesh

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chronos
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The Iraqi government is facing imminent collapse under insurgent pressure, with ISIS reportedly taking control of Mosul. The U.S. has refused military aid to Iraq, primarily to avoid appearing to support Prime Minister al-Maliki, whose Shiite leadership could be seen as backing Iran. Concerns are rising that if insurgents gain control of Baghdad, it could lead to increased conflict with Iran. The Iraqi army, despite being well-trained and outnumbering ISIS, has shown reluctance to engage, leaving military equipment behind in their retreat. The situation is evolving into a civil war, raising fears of broader regional instability and the potential resurgence of terrorism globally.
  • #151
Ryan_m_b said:
If the US put troops forward to combat IS you can bet your bottom dollar it would become guerrilla warfare. Thousands of civilians have flocked to IS and given that they aren't a state army they can melt back into civilian life, or across the borders back into Syria. There's also the question of what US troops would actually achieve. If they halt this advance what's to stop IS coming back? Or other groups taking advantage of local dissatisfaction.

I agree so there's little chance the US will send in regular troops to the front lines but our SF guys are there now and have been there since the beginning. Our attempt to rescue James Foley is a example.
Hopefully there won't be a way back to Syria if there is a unified front to destroy ISIS.

Ryan_m_b said:
I really hope this is some sort of bad sense of humor because if not it doesn't reveal anything good about you. You realize that any sort of mass bombing is going to hugely affect the civilian population? Terrorist groups can easily jump borders and find shelter elsewhere. The people who live there: not so much. And if their infrastructure is "bombed to the Stone Age" then they are going to experience abject poverty. The sort which is a) horrific any human being should live through and b) a great way to radicalize people and create more terrorists.

No, it's not humor and I admit to not being a 'good' person when things got ugly.
I'm not advocating the mass bombing of the civilian population in this case or in Afghanistan as it's not 'total' war and was controversial even during WW2 but having spent several years near Afghanistan during the Soviet occupation I can tell you for a fact the USSR had no problem using a page out of LeMay's book to completely destroy the infrastructure of Afghanistan. Soviet attacks backed with massive firepower delivered from fixed-winged aircraft, helicopters, artillery, rocket launchers and tanks destroyed entire cities, villages, crops, irrigation, power plants, industrial facilities and they tried to kill literally anything that moved as SOP. It did radicalize people and create more terrorists for Islamic militancy and (with US providing arms to the Mujahideen) ultimately failed to stop the Mujahideen, created the extremism of the Taliban and the last 20 years of jihadist. This is the reality we face if we partner with people like Assad who use Soviet tactics to win wars. I don't think it's a good choice but it might be the only one we can make if we declare ISIS a 'clear and present' danger to the security of the US.

http://world.einnews.com/article/219924643/sfDTlxF01rdUgoYf

The Obama administration is considering seeking congressional authorization for military action against the Islamic State under a revamped counter­­terrorism strategy President Obama announced last year.

A mandate from Congress could provide domestic legal justification for the unlimited use of force against the Sunni Muslim group across Iraq and Syria, a senior administration official said. Congress last formally authorized such action in 2001, against al-Qaeda and its associates, and 2002, against Iraq under Saddam Hussei
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #152
Finding an ISIS camp in the Internet age

https://bellingcat.com/resources/ca...d-road-marches-finding-an-isis-training-camp/

Have you ever wondered what it would be like to go through training as an ISIS terrorist? Or better yet, where you would go to find such advanced training? All you have to do to find the answer to these questions is turn to the nearest ISIS media twitter account and click on that bright blue Justpaste.it link. Let’s take a look at the photos posted in July showing one of the Islamic State’s training camps in Ninewa Province and see what we can learn.
 
  • #153
http://www.smh.com.au/world/rapper-...leys-executioner-reports-20140824-107w1i.html

British rapper suspected as Foley's executioner

London rapper Abdel-Majed Abdel Bary has been identified as the leading suspect in the beheading of US journalist James Foley, according to reports
...
British SAS forces are hunting Foley's killer, using a range of high-tech equipment to track him down and potentially free other hostages.

The SAS are a mean bunch, if they find him he's in for a world of hurt.
 
  • #154
US authorities should take similar responsibility for Americans gone rogue and fighting among those lunatics.
 
  • #155
mheslep said:
US authorities should take similar responsibility for Americans gone rogue and fighting among those lunatics.

Americans who join the opposition should be treated like any other combatant, IMO.

But it's quite noble of the Brits to feel it's their obligation to go get "their" guy :thumbs:.
 
  • #156
had to post this from my mate's FB wall...
it sums up the general confusion that a lot of us have of the politics concerning the middle east...


Does this make it clear as mud? Are you confused by what is going on in the Middle East

Let me TRY to explain it to you in simple terms!.

We support the Iraqi government in the fight against ISIS.
We don’t like ISIS, but ISIS is supported by Saudi Arabia who we do like.
We don’t like Assad in Syria. We support the fight against him, but ISIS is also fighting against him.
We don’t like Iran, but Iran supports the Iraqi government in its fight against ISIS.
So some of our friends support our enemies, some enemies are now our friends,
And some of our enemies are fighting against our other enemies, who we want to lose,
But we don’t want our enemies who are fighting our enemies to win.
If the people we want to defeat are defeated, they could be replaced by people we like even less.
And all this was started by us invading a country to drive out terrorists
Who were not actually there until we went into drive them out.
It's quite simple, really.

Got it ??
 
  • #157
davenn said:
had to post this from my mate's FB wall...
it sums up the general confusion that a lot of us have of the politics concerning the middle east...

I didn't know the Saudis had supported ISIS. hmmmm...

Islamic State requires Saudi Arabia to rethink its support for extremism
The Saudi government may deny links to the group, but its promotion of hardline Islam is not something the west can ignore any longer
Nesrine Malik
theguardian.com, Friday 29 August 2014 06.38 EDT
...
But it seems even Saudis are beginning to see the foolhardiness of this arrangement. In a searing essay in the Saudi newspaper Al Riyadh last week, Hissa bint Ahmed bin Al al-Sheikh, a member of one of the most influential religious families in Saudi Arabia and a relative of the grand mufti, rails against the “farce of fatwas” in the kingdom, and records a litany of extremist measures introduced since the 1980s that have stifled public life and glorified a culture of “hatred and death” that she recognises in Isis. This is a culture disseminated via state media, the national curriculum and public order laws – legislation that many Saudi intellectuals warned against.
...


Live and learn.

I can't find an English translation of Hissa's essay, and the google translation is mostly gibberish.
 
  • #158
The Saudi royal family helped to create this mess and personally I hope they reap what they have sown.

http://news.yahoo.com/iraq-begins-major-operation-free-jihadist-besieged-town-140421003.html

The drive to break the more than two-month siege of Amerli came as an NGO said that the Islamic State (IS) jihadist group, which has surrounded the Shiite Turkmen-majority town, sold at least 27 women in Syria after kidnapping them in Iraq.

http://news.yahoo.com/dozens-yazidi-women-sold-marriage-jihadists-ngo-142525440.html

Both UN officials and Yazidis fleeing IS advances in Iraq have said fighters kidnapped women to be sold into forced marriages.

UN religious right monitor Heiner Beilefeldt warned earlier this month of reports of women being executed and kidnapped by IS militants.

"We have reports of women being executed and unverified reports that strongly suggest that hundreds of women and children have been kidnapped –- many of the teenagers have been sexually assaulted, and women have been assigned or sold to 'IS' fighters," she said.
 
  • #159
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...0d9-11e4-9b98-848790384093_story.html?hpid=z1

“Everyone in Amerli saw the bombardment from their houses,” Mustafa Hassan Tayyeb, a resident of Amerli and colonel in the Iraqi army, said Sunday in a telephone interview.

He had been fighting the militants alongside his neighbors for about 80 days, he said, adding that the U.S. strikes were very accurate and had destroyed several of the militants’ vehicles.

“Our morale is very high. We resisted these people, and we won,” said Taqi, the politician, when reached by telephone after the siege was broken Sunday. “Now all we need is food and water.”

You can run but you can't hide.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSBOu2O0zXs
Too bad they know what's coming. You can see how precise our weapons are and can be effectively used close to civilians without great harm.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Ppd09ATLaA
 
Last edited:
  • #160
Unrest in Iraq and Syria

It is certainly a regional/cross-border matter, with ISIS/ISIL active in both nations.

The Islamic State group holds roughly a third of Iraq and Syria, including several strategically important cities like Fallujah and Mosul in Iraq and Raqqa in Syria. It rules over a population of several million people with its strict interpretation of Islamic law. It also controls many of the roads linking the communities it has conquered — although much of the territory in between is sparsely populated desert.

It claims thousands of heavily armed fighters, and has set up its own civil administrations and judiciaries.

"It acts as a state in areas that don't have a state at the moment. It's effective because it provides services, it has a military presence, it speaks as a state," said Hassan Hassan, an analyst at The Delma Institute in Abu Dhabi.
https://news.yahoo.com/look-dangers-posed-islamic-state-group-175720845.html

The Islamic State group is a far superior threat today than al-Qaida was in 2001. It is richer, operates a modern, effective media arm and holds much more territory than al-Qaida ever did.

The United States had verified the authenticity of a video released Tuesday showing the beheading of freelance reporter Steven Sotloff. :frown:
http://news.yahoo.com/us-says-sotloff-beheading-video-authentic-083130265--politics.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #161
RIP Steven Sotloff. ISIS has become a playground for crazies.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...e-islamic-states-beheading-of-steven-sotloff/

The Islamic State’s foreign fighters, who operated on the fringes in their home countries, account for a substantial portion of shocking acts of violence. Some of them were reportedly just criminals found to have psychotic tendencies.
...
The Soufan Group, an intelligence consultantcy, reported that because the Islamic State’s grip on territorial gains remains tenuous at best, its commitment to extreme violence makes it vulnerable. Its enemies list keeps growing. “Recent videos showing the massacre of over one hundred Syrian soldiers … and the apparent beheading of a Sunni Lebanese soldier produced more negative reactions than positive,” the group’s report stated.
 
  • #162
lisab said:
Americans who join the opposition should be treated like any other combatant, IMO.

I completely agree.

Having spent the past couple months in Kurdish Iraq, such sympathies and respect for the Kurdish people. They've been getting the business end of the stick from all sides, for a few thousand years.
 
Last edited:
  • #163
Islamic State massacre survivor who faked death speaks about harrowing escape
http://news.yahoo.com/isis-isil-survivor-speaks-video-201355056.html
Sunni soldiers were allowed to repent, but Kadhim and the other Shiites were "marked for death" and lined up before a firing squad.

“I just pretended to be shot,” he said.

After realizing the bullet passed by his head, Kadhim fell forward into a ditch, where he stayed still for four hours. He eventually made it to a riverbank, where he ate insects and plants for three days alongside a badly injured soldier, who never made it out alive.
 
  • #164
nsaspook said:
I agree so there's little chance the US will send in regular troops to the front lines but our SF guys are there now and have been there since the beginning. Our attempt to rescue James Foley is a example.
Hopefully there won't be a way back to Syria if there is a unified front to destroy ISIS.

Here comes a great knight with his mighty army, armed with the blessing of his king to work with the US in ridding the world of the Islamic State (ISIS).
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-29079052#
 
  • #165
Islam - terorism = Real Islam
 
  • #166
The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria or the Dash ..
I have to say they did not know the meaning of Islam ...
Nowhere in Islam is not violence advice ...

Islam - terrorism = Real Islam

With the help of the people in these animals (terrorists) will be destroyed.
If colonialist powers allow
 
  • #167
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-29098099

Kurdish forces in northern Iraq have recaptured a strategically important mountain from Islamic State (IS) militants, helped by US air strikes.
...
The BBC's Jim Muir in Iraq says Mount Zartak was retaken in a short, sharp battle that left more than 30 IS fighters dead.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics...n-broad-based-assault-isis-syria-barack-obama

"Everyone needs to cool the jet engines, almost literally," said one Whitehall source, with another saying: "It is a case of going slowly, slowly to catch a monkey."

Cameron said: "I think sometimes people think that there is no strategy unless it simply consists of air strikes. That is not the case. It needs a fully formed strategy to squeeze this from every angle and that is what you are getting from this Nato conference today."

I don't think we want to catch the monkey in this case, we should blast them into a corner and wipe them out.

WARNING graphic video from the US State Dept directed to Islamic audiences.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #168
Arab League chief: Confront Islamic State group
http://news.yahoo.com/iraqi-governor-wounded-during-islamic-state-clash-125328461.html

Jeddah (Saudi Arabia) (AFP) - King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia has warned that the West will be the next target of the jihadists sweeping through Syria and Iraq, unless there is "rapid" action.

"If we ignore them, I am sure they will reach Europe in a month and America in another month," he said in remarks quoted on Saturday by Asharq al-Awsat daily and Saudi-backed Al-Arabiya television station.

"Terrorism knows no border and its danger could affect several countries outside the Middle East," said the king. . . .
http://news.yahoo.com/saudi-king-warns-west-jihadists-next-target-093701543.html

Why does it seem that the world is going to hell in a hand basket?

So where are the peace makers? :frown:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #169
Why does it seem that the world is going to hell in a hand basket?

Information overload.

This "information age" was supposed to make us all communicate and get along like the rational beings we are not .
But as Dr Moreau observed, "The Beast keeps creeping out."

I blame the computers..
 
  • #170
Astronuc said:
Arab Lea :frown:

hi dear Astronuc
Excuseme
I'm not too fluent in English
The Dash is in possession of advanced weapons
Where provided weapons?
It comes equipped Dash King of plays ...
What do you think ...?
 
  • #171
morteza said:
hi dear Astronuc
Excuseme
I'm not too fluent in English
The Dash is in possession of advanced weapons
Where provided weapons?
It comes equipped Dash King of plays ...
What do you think ...?

Hi morteza - welcome to PF.

I'm not sure what you mean by this - what is "The Dash"?
 
  • #172
lisab said:
Hi morteza - welcome to PF.

I'm not sure what you mean by this - what is "The Dash"?

I think that's ISIS!
 
  • #173
Vanadium 50 said:
My question was even simpler - was the administration's position that this is a brand new war, or a continuation of an old war?

And we now have an answer: according to The Daily Beast, this is a continuation of an old war: specifically the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force against al Qaeda.

The article also points out the irony that ISIS/ISIL is an opponent of al Qaeda.
 
  • #174
Vanadium 50 said:
And we now have an answer: according to The Daily Beast, this is a continuation of an old war: specifically the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force against al Qaeda.

The article also points out the irony that ISIS/ISIL is an opponent of al Qaeda.

According to what I recall of his speech, and what I have heard on TV, the only thing President Obama intends to ask Congress for is permission to arm and train the Syrian rebels.
 
Last edited:
  • #175
nsaspook said:
...You can run but you can't hide.
But of course they can, with a little luck, for years. The President's version yesterday was, "you will find no safe haven." Of course they do, and will. Bin Laden holed up for 11 years. Bin Laden's lieutenant, Ayman al-Zawahiri, has not been caught and manages to continue releasing videos. A terrorist can't really fight the US in the field, but yes they can and do hide.
 
  • #176
mheslep said:
But of course they can, with a little luck, for years. The President's version yesterday was, "you will find no safe haven." Of course they do, and will.

The top lieutenants might be able to hide for a while but most of these clowns will go back to robbing local stores when ISIS broken as a military force. The States in the area that supported IS in Syria and Iraq have no love for these criminals inside their own countries.
 
  • #178
mheslep said:
But of course they can, with a little luck, for years. The President's version yesterday was, "you will find no safe haven." Of course they do, and will. Bin Laden holed up for 11 years. Bin Laden's lieutenant, Ayman al-Zawahiri, has not been caught and manages to continue releasing videos. A terrorist can't really fight the US in the field, but yes they can and do hide.

But even so, you *must* admit being a terrorist is an extremely hazardous job, unless you're at the tippy-top. How many top-ranking al-Qaeda guys were killed before they got #1?

Keep in mind, "you will find no safe haven" was also woven into the policies of the last president, and it will be in the next. And the ones after that, probably for our lifetimes.
 
  • #179
From Astronuc's link:

Islamic State militants in Iraq and Syria now have about 20,000 to 31,500 fighters on the ground, the Central Intelligence Agency said, much higher than a previous estimate of 10,000.

Among those in Syria are 15,000 foreign fighters including 2,000 Westerners,

Almost half ?
 
  • #180
  • #181
Dotini said:
Syria, the state most eager to fight ISIS, has been ruled out of the coalition, as presumably has been Iran.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/12/w...e-tepid-support-to-us-fight-against-isis.html

While we might not support Syria and Iran openly in this the only way to be effective is with their help. Tactical operation within Syria would be risky without coordination with their air defenses so I would expect we would hold our nose and be nice to them at the military level with a secure transponder code. (we don't target lock you and you don't target lock us).
 
Last edited:
  • #182
morteza said:
hi dear Astronuc
Excuseme
I'm not too fluent in English
The Dash is in possession of advanced weapons
Where provided weapons?
It comes equipped Dash King of plays ...
What do you think ...?
Dash or DASH is apparently an Arabic term for what the west calls ISIS/ISIL.

I'm unsure of the details of how and what weapons they have acquired, but they are quite strong in the region. They seem to be a rather violent/brutal group.

Yesterday I was listening to some interviews of Syrians and Iraqis about how ISIS is destroying their country and culture. ISIS conducts public executions and families are bringing their children to watch, even to casually dine near the decapitated heads of victims. How profoundly sad and sickening!

http://www.npr.org/blogs/parallels/...rule-municipal-services-and-public-beheadingsMeanwhile in the US -

As Visible Villain, Islamic State Alters U.S. Political Calculus
http://www.npr.org/2014/09/10/347528651/as-visible-villain-isis-alters-u-s-political-calculus

Obama's Hawkish Plan For Islamic State Puts Doves In A Quandary
http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpoli...lan-for-islamic-state-puts-doves-in-a-quandry
 
  • #183
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #184
Houston - we have a problem.

From the Wikipedia article cited by morteza.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_State_of_Iraq_and_the_Levant#Ideology_and_beliefs
ISIS is a Sunni extremist group that follows al-Qaeda's hard-line ideology and adheres to global jihadist principles.

ISIS follows an extreme anti-Western interpretation of Islam, promotes religious violence and regards those who do not agree with its interpretations as infidels or apostates.
Add to that, the anti-Shia ideology, and one has IS vs the rest of the world.

Oh, yeah - we have a Big problem.

So violence begets violence in an ongoing conflict seemingly never to end. :frown:

Whatever happened to سلام‎ Salām / שָׁלוֹם Shalom?
 
  • #185
"[IS] promotes religious violence and regards those who do not agree with its interpretations as infidels or apostates."

Those views extend far beyond IS. Majorities in several countries favor death for anyone who leaves the Islamic religion per http://pewglobal.org/files/pdf/265.pdf: Pakistanis 78%, Egyptians 84%. Among Pakistanis, 83% favor stoning adulterers. In the UK, 68% of Muslims "support the arrest and prosecution of those British people who "insult Islam.""
 
  • Like
Likes Q_Goest
  • #186
mheslep said:
Those views extend far beyond IS. Majorities in several countries favor death for anyone who leaves the Islamic religion per http://pewglobal.org/files/pdf/265.pdf: Pakistanis 78%, Egyptians 84%. Among Pakistanis, 83% favor stoning adulterers. In the UK, 68% of Muslims "support the arrest and prosecution of those British people who "insult Islam.""

Ha! I just had a revelation. But then, a white moth landed on my wrist. I took it as a sign that I'd be committing suicide if I shared it.

Umm...

I'll just share Astro's sentiment: խաղաղություն

And, being it's Saturday night, I decided to go to my fridge, and look for my necklace thingys, and noticed that I didn't have the one hanging that said "Mir".

So I looked around the house, and found my Parsi, "Learn 100 words!" stack of flash cards.

The one on top was the phrase; "Takte Khab", which always sounded too much like; "Taxi Cab", which oddly enough, means "bed".

pf.iraq.2014.09.13.2126.someone.call.me.a.taxi.jpg


I also took that as a sign.

Good night.

--------------------------
as usual, ok2di&b
ps. I have absolutely no clue as to how to pronounce "peace" in Armenian.
 
  • #187
Astronuc said:
... and one has IS vs the rest of the world.

I wish that was the case. Unfortunately, it may not be that simple.

In most Arabic countries, while there is genuine abhor at the brutality of Isis actions, the rhetoric is not at all unfamiliar. Also there is a non-negligible numbers of non-violent hard-liners who, while not condoning all their actions, share most of its ideology.

A case in point is the Saudi regime. From beheading blasphemers and apostates to morality police checking women dress codes, they share a lot of Isis beliefs. The main difference is that the Saudis aren't expansionists. That's why Saudi only flipped out when Isis declared a caliphate, implicitly declaring war on all muslim regimes that refuse to give allegiance to Al-baghdadi.

For the time being the sympathisers aren't vocal in defence of Isis, owing to its extreme brutality. This will definitely change if an all out war spearheaded by the US starts against them. Especially if (when) shelling and air strikes claim civilians lives in the Isis ruled areas.

I'm not necessarily arguing against a more elaborate and wider military action against Isis. I genuinely don't know what the best solution to that threat is. But I can definitely see the potential for it getting much worse if a US-led war starts against them which may strengthen their weak and pragmatic alliances with sunni tribes in the region and help them recruit more sunni extremists from the wider middle east.
 
  • Like
Likes mheslep
  • #188
mheslep said:
Those views extend far beyond IS. Majorities in several countries favor death for anyone who leaves the Islamic religion per http://pewglobal.org/files/pdf/265.pdf: Pakistanis 78%, Egyptians 84%.

I couldn't find the Egypt statistics in your source, which looks alarmingly high. I found Egypt mentioned in 4 statistics in this report but none of them is related to capital punishment for apostasy. Did you get that from a different source or am I just too incompetent to find it?
 
  • #189
Britain mourns slain hostage; another under threat
http://news.yahoo.com/uks-cameron-calls-emergency-meeting-killing-074840916.html

British aid worker David Haines has been beheaded — like two American journalists before him — and the Islamic State group is threatening to kill a fourth captive.

David Haines was kidnapped in Syria in March 2013 while working for the French aid group Agency for Technical Cooperation and Development, or ACTED, to help victims of the fighting.

He had also worked for groups such as Handicap International, which helps the disabled during conflicts, and Nonviolent Peaceforce, which sends unarmed peacekeepers into conflict zones. He had previously been in Libya during its civil war, as well as South Sudan.

Peace be upon David Haines and his family and friends.


Meanwhile -
Australia Prime Minister Tony Abbott said on Sunday a 600-strong force comprising some 400 airforce personnel and 200 special forces soldiers would be deployed to a U.S. military base in the United Arab Emirates.
http://news.yahoo.com/australia-commits-jets-international-force-fight-militants-040453556.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #190
omcheeto said:
ha! I just had a revelation. But then, a white moth landed on my
the one on top was the phrase; "takte khab", which always sounded too much like; "taxi cab", which oddly enough, means "bed".
and found my Parsi, "Learn 100 words!" stack of flash cards.
pf.iraq.2014.09.13.2126.someone.call.me.a.taxi.jpg

i also took that as a sign.
[/size]
What do you mean this picture
And your posts ... ?
 
  • #191
Astronuc said:
Britain mourns slain hostage; another under threat
; said:
British aid worker David Haines has been beheaded — like two American journalists before him — and the Islamic State group is threatening to kill a fourth captive.
040453556.html[/url]

040453556.html[/url]
But many questions arise ...!
Why not show complete killing David Haines ...?
 
  • #192
morteza said:
But many questions arise ...!
Why not show complete killing David Haines ...?
It saddens me to think that anyone would want to watch something like that. Would you want it shown if it was one of your relatives?
 
  • #193
HossamCFD said:
I couldn't find the Egypt statistics in your source, which looks alarmingly high. I found Egypt mentioned in 4 statistics in this report but none of them is related to capital punishment for apostasy. Did you get that from a different source or am I just too incompetent to find it?

Egypt number comes from a different pew link

when asked about the death penalty for those who leave the Muslim religion, at least three-quarters of Muslims in Jordan (86%), Egypt (84%) and Pakistan (76%) say they would favor making it the law; in Nigeria, 51% of Muslims favor and 46% oppose it. In contrast, Muslims in Lebanon, Turkey and Indonesia largely reject the notion that harsh punishments should be the law in their countries. About three-quarters of Turkish and Lebanese Muslims oppose the stoning of people who commit adultery (77% and 76%, respectively), as does a narrower majority (55%) of Muslims in Indonesia.
http://www.pewglobal.org/2010/12/02/muslims-around-the-world-divided-on-hamas-and-hezbollah/
 
  • Like
Likes Q_Goest
  • #195
Borg said:
It saddens me to think that anyone would want to watch something like that. Would you want it shown if it was one of your relatives?

I do not understand what's wrong
You've already seen pictures of people getting killed by your Daesh?

If your answer is yes ...
So why the difference is ...
Because the victim is not crowded and noisy?
It's not because I'm being cruel ...
And I'm skeptical Dash and objectives
I do not know what the goals of the Daesh ...
He passed away condolences to his family and the British people say ...

Daesh = Islamic State of Iraq and the Syria
 
  • #196
morteza said:
I do not understand what's wrong
You've already seen pictures of people getting killed by your Daesh?

If your answer is yes ...
The answer is no, I have not seen those pictures. IMO, only a seriously disturbed individual would want to view pictures like that.
 
  • #197
morteza said:
I do not understand what's wrong
You've already seen pictures of people getting killed by your Daesh?
...
Daesh = Islamic State of Iraq and the Syria

These Insane Sadistic crazies know the limits of modern media IRT what is allowed to be posted away from the bowels of the Internet and leaving it to the imagination to generate the horror of his last living moments generates the same gut response without people wanting to block-out the entire memory of what happened.
 
  • #198
morteza said:
What do you mean this picture
And your posts ... ?

Sometimes, there is no meaning.

Sometimes, a bunch of words and images just mean; "Hello!".

:smile:
 
  • #199
HossamCFD said:
I'm not necessarily arguing against a more elaborate and wider military action against Isis. I genuinely don't know what the best solution to that threat is. But I can definitely see the potential for it getting much worse if a US-led war starts against them which may strengthen their weak and pragmatic alliances with sunni tribes in the region and help them recruit more sunni extremists from the wider middle east.

It looks like the coalition being assembled may be a bit too weak to match the goals set by President Obama.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/12/w...column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
 
  • #200
Dotini said:
It looks like the coalition being assembled may be a bit too weak to match the goals set by President Obama.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/12/w...column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

I'm having a hard time trying to understand what's actually being planned at the moment. I imagine the plan is that the US along with a few other NATO members will provide air support, intel, and perhaps a supply of weapons and pretty much everything apart from 'boots on the ground'. Those boots will have to come from local armies, mainly the Iraqi forces and the Peshmerga. It seems that the current negotiations are aiming to provide extra ground troops/air support (both?) from bigger armies in the region such as Turkey, Egypt, Saudi, and perhaps Jordan and few other gulf countries.

I suppose the contribution of Turkey et al. to the coalition would be important if NATO wants to avoid sending ground troops since relying only on Iraq & Peshmerga ground forces would take a long time to drive ISIS back, let alone push into Syria. It will also challenge the ever so present rhetoric that this is yet another western invasion of Iraq. This would be very similar to the minor and mostly politically motivated contribution of Egypt and Syria in the first gulf war.

Turkey is certainly the biggest asset here, with a modern army and direct access to ISIS territory. However, they have this hostage situation which is making them very reluctant to get directly involved. The Egyptian army hasn't participated in any major war since 1973 (apart from the minor involvement in the first gulf war) and it's unclear how much help they can provide. There are a few factors that make me doubt they will send a substantial force; first they may suffer big loses due to their unpreparedness and the public will certainly not like it, not least because there is little justification for Egypt's involvement since ISIS doesn't really pose a local threat yet. Second, Egypt is already struggling with militant islamists in Sinai and an involvement in Iraq will only make this worse.

I think the elephant in the room here really is Syria. While I can imagine Turkey and a few Arabic countries sending troops to Iraq with the invitation of the local government, I think none of them can afford being seen even indirectly helping Assad in Syria. I think this is also true, though to a lesser extend, for the US as well. On the other hand combating ISIS only in Iraq without tackling their stronghold in Syria seems very ineffective.

Sorry for a long and quite incoherent post but I am trying to make any sense of what's going on. I guess we'll have to wait and see how will the events unfold.
 
  • Like
Likes mheslep

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
62
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
91
Views
9K
Back
Top