Iron core for Electrostatic coil

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of iron cores in Stubblefield coils, focusing on the type of steel to use, specifically 1018 steel, and the effects of hot versus cold rolling on magnetic properties. Participants explore the implications of these choices on magnetic retention and performance, as well as testing methods for iron cores.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether 1018 steel, commonly used in bolts, is suitable for the Stubblefield coil and asks about the benefits of using cold rolled versus hot rolled steel for magnetic collapse and retention.
  • Another participant mentions that many iron core transformers use laminated sheets to reduce eddy current losses, suggesting that this might be relevant to the discussion of iron cores.
  • There is uncertainty about whether a higher concentration of iron would improve performance, and one participant expresses a lack of clarity on how the rolling process affects core performance.
  • A later reply provides a detailed description of constructing a Stubblefield coil, including specific materials and winding techniques, but does not address the original question about steel types directly.
  • One participant shares results from testing an unknown steel rod and galvanized iron wire against magnets, questioning the effectiveness of these tests for evaluating iron cores.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and certainty regarding the properties of different types of steel and their effects on the performance of Stubblefield coils. There is no consensus on the best type of steel or the optimal construction method for the coils.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for further investigation into the effects of hot and cold rolling on magnetic properties, as well as the potential for different types of steel to influence performance. The discussion includes references to specific construction techniques that may not be universally agreed upon.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in experimental electromagnetism, coil construction, and those exploring alternative energy devices may find this discussion relevant.

FSumm
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am just an electrician doing experimental work with a Stubblefield coil. From what I've read the most common steel is 1018. If Stubblefield used a common bolt I assume this would fall into the 1018 realm. Would the 1018 iron core be better cold rolled or hot rolled for the magnetic collapse as well as the least amount of magnetic retention? Should I use a different type of steel?
I have an unknown steel 4 inch 3/4" sample rod that I put on 2 magnetron toroidal magnets overnight. I then put it up against an old color monitor and it showed no magnetic field at all. I did the same with a galvanized iron wire and that does show a magnetic field.
Would this be a good test for iron cores or should an electromagnet be made to see if it retains the magnetic field? Thank you for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WOW, my first question was going to be what is a "Stubblefield coil"? I Googled and came up with some "marginal" science applications.

The purpose of the steel is for a iron core? Many iron core transformers are "laminated" sheets, not solid. This reduces eddy current losses.

As far as the "iron" itself, perhaps a higher concentration is better? I'm not sure how hot rolled or cold rolled affects core performance? An interesting question that I'm sure transformer manufacturers know the answer to...

Here is a wiki link, sounds like "soft" iron is the way to go, I assume that means "low carbon":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_core
 
Last edited:
Yes the 1018 steel has a large iron content and low carbon. I am just wondering about the hot or cold aspects and how their differing internal structures would affect the field collapse and if one has a greater degree of remanence.
 
Hello FSumm,

The Stubblefield Coil is a reality, and it appears to work although at this date, we are not very sure how.

You will need to wind 2 bare wires, a Copper wire, which must be insulated in cotton thread someway, and a bare steel wire.
Build a counter rotating wheel setup with 3 cotton reels on each disk, feed the copper wire through the axle, go and search for my machine on OU to give you some idea of what you need etc etc.

Wind both together wires in Bifilar, (2 together) very tightly, but be very careful you don't short them together.
Between EVERY layer of turns, place a cotton layer the full width of the turns with a bed sheet or pillow case.
Then continue the winds.

No one seems to know how many layers or total winds, to make up the coil.

It seems there is an interaction between the Iron and the Copper wires, when they are damp, too wet, reaction decays, too dry reactioon decays. The reaction is between dissimilar metals, the current/voltage builds up, then reaches a trip over to off threashold, the magnetic field collapses, the secondary coil (which I haven't discribed) absorbs the energy and produces power.

Thats it in a nutshell.

Now go to it and make your self powering Stubblefield Coil, once you see it running for months, powering a motor or light, then you will understand the enormious invention is in front of you.
Good luck with it.

Google "Lasersaber Stubblefield coil" to see his working and his youtube Parts 1 to 5 on how to build one. There I have answered all your questions :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K