Irradiance of sun in an image?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the irradiance of the Sun in an image based on given parameters, including the Sun's irradiance at sea level of 500 W/m². The user attempts to determine the total power falling on the lens and subsequently the power per unit area in the image. They calculate the area of the lens and the image, leading to an estimated irradiance of 2.29 x 10^9 W/m². However, there is uncertainty regarding the lens diameter, which is crucial for accurate calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding lens properties and refractive index in determining the upper bounds of irradiance.
carnivalcougar
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What will be the irradiance (power per unit area) in the image, if the Sun's irradiance at the sea level is I = 500W/m^2

Lens is 200mm f
Sun is 150x10^9 m away
Diameter of sun is 1.4x10^9 m


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I know that at the lens the irradiance will be the same i.e. 500W/m^2 but at the image the irradiance will be magnified. I'm not sure how to get there though.
I know an image of the sun will be .2m from the lens and the diameter of the image will be .00187m because M=di/do = .2m/150x10^9 = 1.333X10^-12 and 1.333x10^-12 multiplied by the diameter of the sun is .000187m.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the total power falling on the lens? What's the total power in the image?
 
I'm not sure how to find the diameter of the lens which is what I need to find the total power falling on the lens
 
I think that the radius of the lens is equal to 2f which would make the radius .4m. Therefore, the area of the lens is .50265m^2. Multiply this by 500 and this tells you the power on the lens which is 251.327W. The area of the image is 1.099X10^-7m^2 which is from ((.000187m)^2(pi)). Therefore, 251.327W also falls on this same area and dividing 251.327W by the area of the image (1.099X10^-7m^2) will give you the power per m^2 which is 2.29X10^9 W/m^2

Is this correct?
 
carnivalcougar said:
I'm not sure how to find the diameter of the lens which is what I need to find the total power falling on the lens

Good point. Then I don't see how you can answer the question. carnivalcougar gives a way to find an upper bound, since the focal length sets a limit on the diameter of the lens. But it will depend on the refractive index.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top