Irradiate PtCl2 in a reactor core

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yolz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Core Reactor
AI Thread Summary
Irradiating PtCl2 in a reactor core poses risks, particularly if aluminum (Al) is used as a container, as it can corrode when in contact with water at high temperatures, such as 300°C. The neutron flux could activate the Al, potentially leading to chemical reactions between chlorine and aluminum. If the aluminum cladding breaches, it could result in hazardous chemical reactions. To mitigate these risks, it is advisable to use a hermetically sealed stainless steel capsule for containment. Proper reactor type selection and operational conditions are crucial for safety.
Yolz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
As part of an experiment, I'm looking to irradiate PtCl2 in a reactor core, PtCl2 will be contained in an Al container. What's the worst that could happen?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


What kind of reactor? LWR? BWR or PWR? or HWR, or GCR? or test reactor? What temperature?

If Al has contact with water at 300C, then corrosion could be a problem. Al will become activated in a neutron flux. One might also get a chemical reaction with Cl and Al.

If the Al cladding were to breach then there would probably be a chemical reaction.

I would think that one would put the Al capsule in a hermetically sealed stainless steel capsule.
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top