A computer teacher on a physics roll here?

AI Thread Summary
A teacher claims that magnetism can be harnessed for superluminal travel by using planetary magnetic fields as energy boosts. However, this idea contradicts the principles of Special Relativity (SR), which states that nothing can exceed the speed of light. An example is presented where a signal sent at 1.2c would reach aliens before the cause of the signal, violating causality. The discussion emphasizes the need for a compelling argument against the teacher's assertion, highlighting that established physics provides clear reasoning against superluminal travel. Ultimately, the impossibility of such concepts is well-documented in SR literature.
Imparcticle
Messages
572
Reaction score
4
A certain teacher at my school who teaches compters always says "Magnetism is the future". He says that by utilizing the magnetic fields of planets as "energy boosts or a trampoline" for travel at c+. I explained this is impossible, according to SR a while back, but I backed off (because he was very determined in his idea). But now, I need a really compelling arguement. So, anyone here want to help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure. Try this: Alright, suppose you somehow manage to extract energy from a magnetic field by allowing it to accelerate a charged particle. Even better, a stream of charged particles carrying a message in binary. Suppose it travels at 1.2c and arrives in the radios of some friendly aliens at Proxima Centauri, about 4 light years distant. They, then, observe an effect (the signal) preceeding a cause (the use of the magnetic field to send the signal), which is of course impossible.

In a good SR textbook, there are more elaborate examples of why superluminal travel is impossible.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top