Is a 15.0-g Ball from a Spring Gun Safe Without Goggles for Children?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the maximum speed of a 15.0-g ball shot from a spring gun with a force constant of 600 N/m and a compression of 5.00 cm. The user is trying to determine if the ball's speed necessitates the use of goggles for safety when aimed vertically. They express confusion over their velocity calculation, which differs from the textbook answer, and seek clarification on the change in gravitational potential energy. The conservation of energy principles are applied, but the user struggles with the correct setup of the equations. The thread highlights the importance of accurate energy calculations in determining safety measures for children.
knowNothing23
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Conservation of energy
You are designing a game for small children and want to see if the
ball’s maximum speed is sufficient to require the use of goggles. In your game, a
15.0-g ball is to be shot from a spring gun whose spring has a force constant of
600 N/m. The spring will be compressed 5.00 cm when in use. How fast will the
ball be moving as it leaves the gun and how high will the ball go if the gun is
aimed vertically upward? What would be your recommendation on the use of
goggles?

I have set the gravitational potential energy zero at the mouth of the gun; therefore, the initial gravitational potential energy is negative.

Could anyone help?
Thank you.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


My velocity's answer is different than the one from the book.

Wext = ΔK + ΔU g + ΔU s = 0
or, because Ki = Us,f = Ug,f = 0, **"f" as in final**

(1/2)m(vf)^(2) - mgx − (1/2)k (x)^(2) = 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
knowNothing23 said:
I have set the gravitational potential energy zero at the mouth of the gun; therefore, the initial gravitational potential energy is negative.
OK, but what's the change in gravitational PE?
 
-+-= +.

Thank you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top