Is a < b+ε for all ε>0 true if a is not ≤ b?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Torshi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
Torshi
Messages
118
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Supopse that "a" and "b" are two numbers and that a < b+ε for all ε>0. Show that a ≤ b

Homework Equations



None given for problem

The Attempt at a Solution



See attachment of my jpeg for my attempt. I'm not sure, but i feel like it satisfies the statement
 

Attachments

  • Calc problem graph.jpg
    Calc problem graph.jpg
    5.9 KB · Views: 384
Physics news on Phys.org
The graph does not constitute an argument. I would not even consider drawing a graph for this question (unless instructed to). Or are you just checking you have understood the question?
 
haruspex said:
The graph does not constitute an argument. I would not even consider drawing a graph for this question (unless instructed to). Or are you just checking you have understood the question?

For problems like these, can I use real numbers to try and figure it out?

Assuming a = 5 and b + e = 6. These two values would work because 5 < 6. Since e > 0, it has to be a positive number. To make things easy, we'll pick the smallest positive integer greater than zero: 1. If e becomes equal to 1, then I can say that b is equal to 5. Now I can say that a = b, which satisfies the first part of the second equation.

"b" can be greater than "a" if I pick any number I want "b" to equal, so long as it is greater than "a" by a substantial amount.

Algebraically, I could write that

a < b when e > (b-a), and a = b when e = (b-a) ?
 
This is not a question about integers, I'm sure. It's about reals. And no argument based on specific numbers could be considered a general proof.
Try reductio ad absurdum: assume a is not <= b and see if you can demonstrate this violates "a < b+ε for all ε>0".
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top