Is a Black Hole the Most Dense Object in the Universe?

aise0603
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Mass falling into a black hole will approach the center of the black hole at a given velocity. As it approaches the center of the black hole, from our reference frame, there is time dialation. In fact, at some given closeness, a unit of Planck time, in the mass's reference frame, is longer than the age of the universe.

Gravitational time dilation outside a non-rotating sphere
to = tf(1-2GM/(rc2))1/2

if to = Planck time
tf = the age of the universe
r = Planck distance

solve for M to find the smallest amount of mass that could possibly create a black hole

Ms = 1.09 X 10-8 kg




Density = Ms/Vs = 6.15718 X 1095kg/m3

Is that the most dense that anything could be in the universe?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you have calculated is so called Planck Density:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units

It means that at such density we can't use GR or QM as is
We need to use more advanced theory which does not exist yet.
 
But could it be that in a given reference frame, nothing can be more dense than this? Just like nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, in a given reference frame.
 
In what context do you want us to answer your questions?
As Dmitry mentioned, we have good reason to expect our current theories won't match nature very well in these regimes. And we definitely don't have experimental data from these regimes either. So no "real" answer can be given right now.

But if you are just asking what classical theory like GR says, then the answer is no: there is no density limit. Density is coordinate system dependent, so we can choose a coordinate system which makes it arbitrarily large if we wish. So there is no classical limit on density.

Even ignoring the coordinate system issues, what would you consider a point particle. For example, what is the density of an electron?
 
JustinLevy said:
In what context do you want us to answer your questions?
As Dmitry mentioned, we have good reason to expect our current theories won't match nature very well in these regimes. And we definitely don't have experimental data from these regimes either. So no "real" answer can be given right now.

But if you are just asking what classical theory like GR says, then the answer is no: there is no density limit. Density is coordinate system dependent, so we can choose a coordinate system which makes it arbitrarily large if we wish. So there is no classical limit on density.

Even ignoring the coordinate system issues, what would you consider a point particle. For example, what is the density of an electron?

Typical...
 
aise0603 said:
Typical...

Typical what? It was a good answer to your question.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top