Is a Freezer Truly a Closed System?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DonkeyMaHonkey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2nd law Law Thermo
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of closed systems in thermodynamics, specifically in relation to freezers and the implications of energy sources on entropy and the second law of thermodynamics. Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects of closed systems, energy transfer, and the nature of physical laws.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant argues that a freezer cannot be considered a closed system due to its reliance on an external energy source, specifically the electrical plug.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the definition of closed systems and questions the validity of the second law of thermodynamics, suggesting that no system in reality is truly closed.
  • A participant acknowledges that while closed systems are theoretical constructs, it is possible to analyze systems with minimal energy leakage as if they were closed.
  • There is a suggestion that a closed system could potentially utilize a recycling energy method instead of relying on an external source.
  • One participant emphasizes that the ability of a freezer to freeze requires work, indicating that it cannot function as a closed system and that the energy necessary for this work must come from the external source.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that a freezer is not a closed system, but there is disagreement regarding the implications of this fact and the nature of closed systems in general. Multiple competing views remain regarding the applicability of the second law of thermodynamics and the concept of energy sources.

Contextual Notes

Participants express various assumptions about the definitions of closed systems and the conditions under which thermodynamic laws apply. There is also a lack of consensus on the implications of energy transfer and the nature of physical laws in real-world scenarios.

DonkeyMaHonkey
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have read quite a few discussions about this topic of entropy and if this universe has a truly closed or, as I prefer to describe it "undisturbed", system and I have read some discussions about a freezer and chilling ice cubes etc. etc... To my extent of reading these conversations no one has addressed the actual energy source of the freezer which is the plug in the wall which comes from an external system. Any comments?
 
Science news on Phys.org
I'm not really sure what you are talking about. Indeed a freezer is not a closed system...
 
Agreed. Maybe you can help me, please. What should be a law of physics...do not trust the internet! ;)
Anyway, I was just reading on how people say the 2nd law only works for a closed system; yet the Earth is not closed nor anything else in reality, so how can this be a "law"? There is no true vacuum, if you dig string or most quantum theories, and biology seems to go in the opposite direction. And a star's energy from across the galaxy to conveniently set the universe at net zero doesn't float because a universe that is net zero would not be unstable enough to expand. Please respond.
 
You are right that there can be no such thing as a truly closed system, because there's always going to some energy leaking into or out of the system. However, that doesn't prevent us from mathematically analyzing how such a system would behave if we could construct one, and that's where the law comes from.

It is possible to construct systems in which the energy leakage in or out is small enough to ignore. These act so much like the truly closed systems that we cannot build that we can use the closed system math on them.
 
I guess that makes sense. Thank you.
 
A closed system could maybe have a way of a recycle energy method instead of needing an outside source.
 
With respect to the freezer, yes, it is not a closed system. If it were, then it would not be able to freeze (separating heat from not-heat requires work). How ever, since you know that that is true, then you also know that everything that enables that work to get done has to come in through that small black wire, so you can study the relationship between the cold (not temperature, but heat capacity, or lack of it) and what the wire is doing. Without the law, you have no way of knowing there has to be an exclusive relationship. That's how the relationship between a horse working turning a cannon drill and the heat given off by the work were related.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
12K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K