Is a Lid Stay Suitable for Lifting a 10 kg Part at a 45 Degree Angle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marylaax
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Automatic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the suitability of a Lid Stay for lifting a 10 kg part at a 45-degree angle. It highlights that while the Lid Stay can operate at a maximum angle of 103 degrees, the geometry of the application may lead to a decrease in effective force as the lid opens. The critical factor is the lifting load capacity, which is not specified in the manufacturer's literature. Proper design requires calculating the equilibrium position and ensuring that the selected gas spring can handle the necessary force and moment equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mechanical advantage in lever systems
  • Knowledge of gas spring design principles
  • Familiarity with load capacity specifications for lifting devices
  • Ability to perform moment and force calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research gas spring specifications and load capacities
  • Learn about mechanical advantage calculations in lever systems
  • Study the principles of equilibrium in mechanical design
  • Explore design guidelines for Lid Stays and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, product designers, and anyone involved in mechanical design or lifting mechanisms will benefit from this discussion, particularly those working with Lid Stays and gas springs.

Marylaax
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,
We are working on a mechanism to open an application.And we were thinking to use a LID STAY but we are not sure if this item is suitable for the movement that we need to obtain.
The application requires lifting a 10 kg part. The part is connected to one end of a horizontal lever. When lifted, the lever will travel a 45 degrees angle (Please see the image attached).
https://physicsforums-bernhardtmediall.netdna-ssl.com/data/attachments/92/92447-628c939fb0482cabc309477492272ba8.jpg
I see in the information about the part that the maximum angle is 103 degrees. But I am not sure if it is necessary that the 0 point be in a vertical axis or not.(the part image is attached)
http://www.hafele.co.uk/shop/images/External/pages/15DSH264-265.pdf http://www.hafele.co.uk/shop/images/External/pages/15DSH264-265.pdf
 

Attachments

  • photo_2016-11-24_13-21-59.jpg
    photo_2016-11-24_13-21-59.jpg
    28.2 KB · Views: 714
  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    52.7 KB · Views: 646
  • Capture2.PNG
    Capture2.PNG
    15 KB · Views: 609
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
The manufacturers sheet shows tis unit installed in a geometry that results in an increasing amount mechanical advantage for the device as the lid is lifted (even if the force of the mechanism does not increase as the arm extends the effective lever force pushing the lid open does increase); whereas, in your case that situation is reversed and as your lid is opened and the angle of the arm from the vertical grows smaller the effective force of the device decreases. In other words, it is questionable as to whether this unit will work with your geometry.

Additionally, the amount of weight you are lifting is substantial and I don't see any information in the mfr's literature as to the lifting load capacity of the device; and, that is critical in selecting a device that will lift that much weight.
 
The way I was taught to design gas springs, was to pick an equilibrium position (Somewhere in the middle of your stroke) Where your mass has a 0 net moment and force. Work out the moment questions + force equations to figure out how much force you spring needs. Your dimensions, angles should be based on the available gas springs, since how much travel you can get from gas springs is based on what's available.
 

Similar threads

Aerodynamic Forces on 6' x 3' plate at 45 degrees - 70 MPH?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
White Paper on Revolutionary Technology - X-FORCE
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K