Is a Point Inside a Tilted Cube?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DHack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Point
AI Thread Summary
To determine if a point is inside a tilted cube, first establish the cube's fixed dimensions and its ability to rotate around its edges or corners. The problem involves checking if a point (x, y, z) lies within the cube's boundaries after it has been oriented in space. A recommended approach is to rotate the coordinate system so that the cube's sides align with the axes. Once transformed, verify that the point's coordinates fall within the limits defined by the cube's dimensions. This method effectively simplifies the problem of checking point containment in a tilted cube.
DHack
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to figure out if a point is in a cube that could be tilted in any direction.
How would I do it? I can get anything you need for this problem.

Thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I assume your cube is of fixed dimensions, but free to rotate/tilt about any of its initial edges/corners?
 
arildno said:
I assume your cube is of fixed dimensions, but free to rotate/tilt about any of its initial edges/corners?

Yep.
 
I don't fully understand the question.

Are you saying you have a cube with a known orientation (eg. you are given a unit vector normal to a surface, and the cube centre is fixed at (0, 0, 0)), and want to know if a general point (x, y, z) is in that cube?

Try to develop a method of rotating the coordinate system from the original one to one where the cube sides are perpendicular to the coordinate axes. Then all you need to do is transform your point to this system and ensure it is between each side along all three dimensions.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top