Is a Prime Number Always a Factor of a Product of Integers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter liangiecar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime
liangiecar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How to proof?
A prime number p is a factor of a non-zero product of integers a*b if and only if it is a facotr of a and/or b.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "if" direction is obvious. For the "only if", you need to use the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. Because a*b has a unique prime decomposition, if a prime p divides a*b then it must be one of the primes in the decomposition. The prime decomposition of a*b is just the product of the decompositions of a and b, so p must divide a and/or b.

This sounds like a homework question! In which case you will need to be a lot more rigorous when you write it out.
 
Last edited:
One side is trivial: if p is a factor of a and/or b, then it is clearly a factor of a * b.

For the converse implication, the easiest way I can think of is using the unique decomposition of any integer into its prime factors.
 
thx,guys
 
Caution. Some proofs of unique factorization may use this property of primes. And then it would be illegitimate to use unique factorization in the proof of this...
 
assume p is a factor of ab. then p|ab. since p is prime, euclid's lemma says p|a and/or p|b, thus p is a factor of a and/or b.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top