Is a Single Proton Truly Stable or Do Theories Predict Its Decay?

  • Thread starter Thread starter daumphys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Life Proton Time
daumphys
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
We know hydrogen atom is stable. Then, single proton is stable? Can we store it for a long time without decay?
Do we have any related equation about particle stability?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is currently unknown whether a proton is stable or not. We have never observed one to decay, but it could be either case.
 
In the standard model the proton is stable, but there are various GUT proposals which predict proton decay. Simple models like SU(5) and SO(10) have been ruled out experimentally b/c of the measured minimum proton lifetime; other's are still allowed.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top