Is a surface plasmon an EM wave?

AI Thread Summary
Surface plasmons (SPs) are electron oscillations induced by incident electromagnetic (EM) waves, and they can couple with photons to form surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs). There is confusion regarding whether SPPs and SPs are the same, as some sources use the terms interchangeably. While SPPs involve coupling with photons, they are not considered pure EM waves because they require a medium for propagation and exhibit mechanical wave characteristics. The interaction between EM waves and electronic excitations is typically reflected in the medium's refractive index. Ultimately, SPPs cannot be classified as pure EM waves due to their dependence on matter for propagation.
Aziza
Messages
189
Reaction score
1
From my understanding, surface plasmons (SPs) are oscillations of electrons caused by incident EM waves. A photon from the EM wave can couple with a plasmon to create a surface plasmon polariton (SPP). Some books/websites use the words SPP and SP interchangeably, so I am confused as to whether they really are the same thing or not. I am not sure what this 'coupling' really is. My friend assures me that SPPs are actually EM waves since they are coupled with photons, but I think they are still just mechanical waves since they cannot propagate through vacuum and are longitudinal, at least to my understanding. Does anyone know what exactly is coupling, and if this really does cause something to act as an EM wave, if the coupling is done with a photon??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any EM wave propagating in a medium will couple to electronic excitations. These effects are usually subsumed in the refractive index n of the medium. The relative proportion of energy stored in the em field and in the medium varies with frequency and wavenumber. Usually there is only a small range of frequencies, where both mix considerably, the avoided crossing region. In books this is mostly discussed for phonon polaritons, but the principle is the same for surface plasmon polaritons.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polariton
 
DrDu said:
Any EM wave propagating in a medium will couple to electronic excitations. These effects are usually subsumed in the refractive index n of the medium. The relative proportion of energy stored in the em field and in the medium varies with frequency and wavenumber. Usually there is only a small range of frequencies, where both mix considerably, the avoided crossing region. In books this is mostly discussed for phonon polaritons, but the principle is the same for surface plasmon polaritons.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polariton

but then we cannot call them pure EM waves, correct? because they do need matter through which they can propagate
 
You are right, they are certainly not pure electromagnetic waves. However, nobody claims this.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top