Is an analogus function useful for proving sequence monotonicity?

AI Thread Summary
An analogous function can be used to demonstrate the monotonicity of the sequence defined by a_{n+1} = √(2 + a_n) with a_1 = √2. The derivative of the function y = √(2 + x) is positive, indicating that the sequence is increasing. However, concerns were raised about the appropriateness of the analogous function since it diverges from the limit of the sequence, which converges to 2. It was suggested that mathematical induction or graphical methods might be more effective for proving monotonicity. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the importance of understanding the underlying principles when applying these methods.
DivGradCurl
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
Folks,

This is the solution I have for a problem in my textbook regarding sequences. I just need to know whether I have the right idea in mind.

Thank you very much!


We can use an analogus function to show that the sequence given by

a_{n+1} = \sqrt{2+a_n} \quad a_1 = \sqrt{2}

is increasing. Here it goes

y = \sqrt{2+x} = \left( 2+x \right) ^{\frac{1}{2}}

\frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2+x}}>0 \Longrightarrow a_{n+1}>a_n
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You'd have to prove not that the function itself is increasing but that the nth iterate of x is less than the n+1st iterate of x. IF f is increasing then x<f(x) will to the job, I think, because then you could take f of both sides n times to get f^n(x)<f^n+1(x).

a_n=f^n(x).
 
Ok I gave it some thought and I really can't give you a definitive answer but I can ask you why you think that your analogous function is analogous? The question posed in the book will have a_infinity = 2 and in fact the function converges to the function y^2 - y - 2 = 0, whereas y = sqrt(2+x) goes well beyond 2. It just doesn't add up too well to me. I'll delete this if someone gives a better response (or maybe my incorrectness will compell someone to answer correctly)
 
Guys,

I've just found out it is better to use mathematical induction or graphical methods instead. Thanks for the help.
 
I've used Differential Calculus to find out when does it increase or decrease a sequence with an anologous function, and then just check for n>= 1 values. I see no problem using this method as long as you understand what you're doing.
 
Oh... really? That's good.

Thank you very much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top