Is an Engineering Thermodynamics Class Beneficial for a Physics Major?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the decision to take a Thermodynamics class offered from an engineering perspective, particularly for a physics major. The participant expresses concern about their already heavy course load and questions the value of the engineering-focused class. Responses highlight that if a dedicated thermal physics or statistical mechanics course is unavailable, the engineering class may be a suitable alternative, though it will differ significantly from a traditional physics course. It is emphasized that physics majors should complete a course in statistical mechanics or thermodynamics before graduation, suggesting that taking the engineering course could still be beneficial despite potential differences in focus and workload.
coca-cola
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hey Everyone,

As it turns out my institution offers a Thermodynamics class, but only from an engineering perspective. I am a physics major and was wondering if this class was worth taking. I already have a moderately rigorous course load and this was going to be my last class but now I am starting to think that I shouldn't take it. Has anyone been in a similar situation?

Any advice is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does the physics department not offer a thermal physics/intro to statistical mechanics course? If not, then yea the engineering course would be the next best thing, but note that it would be fairly different than a thermal physics course. The work load of the course would purely depend on the professor, but I don't think most students find thermodynamics to be their most difficult course.

A physics major should take some type of statistical mechanics/thermodynamics course before he/she graduates though.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top