I Is angular momentum conserved in a Supernova?

AI Thread Summary
Angular momentum is conserved during a supernova, similar to how it is conserved when a star contracts into a white dwarf. In a supernova, if a spinning star collapses into a rapidly rotating black hole, the total angular momentum must remain constant. This implies that the fragments ejected from the supernova could have an angular momentum vector that points downwards, counterbalancing the upward momentum of the black hole. The increased spin of the black hole due to decreased rotational inertia must also be factored into the overall conservation equation. Ultimately, the dynamics of angular momentum in supernovae illustrate the complexities of astrophysical processes.
FallenApple
Messages
564
Reaction score
61
I can see how it would be conserved for the situation of a star turning into a white dwarf since the object is just contracting. Just like the classic ice skater example.

But what about a super nova? Say a star with spin up goes supernova and that the remaining black hole also has spin up but is rotating much faster.

Does that mean that the remaining fragments will have a total angular momentum vector that is pointing down? Let's assume that not only is the spin rate faster, but the angular momentum vector itself is larger upwards for the black hole after supernova compared to the upwards vector before as a star. Mathematically, we need an angular momentum vector that is pointing down so that the vector sum is the same as the angular momentum pre-explosion.

Also, conservation makes sense, since there is no external torque form anywhere else in the universe during the implosion/explosion.

But what would this mean? Does it mean that on average, the flying fragments would have spin down?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
FallenApple said:
I can see how it would be conserved for the situation of a star turning into a white dwarf since the object is just contracting. Just like the classic ice skater example.

But what about a super nova? Say a star with spin up goes supernova and that the remaining black hole also has spin up but is rotating much faster.

Does that mean that the remaining fragments will have a total angular momentum vector that is pointing down? Let's assume that not only is the spin rate faster, but the angular momentum vector itself is larger upwards for the black hole after supernova compared to the upwards vector before as a star. Mathematically, we need an angular momentum vector that is pointing down so that the vector sum is the same as the angular momentum pre-explosion.

Also, conservation makes sense, since there is no external torque form anywhere else in the universe during the implosion/explosion.

But what would this mean? Does it mean that on average, the flying fragments would have spin down?

You have to consider that the contraction effect exists on the black hole too. The angular velocity of the black hole might be increased just due to its rotational inertia decreasing (the ice skater effect). Of course the total sum of all momenta still has to be conserved.
 
  • Like
Likes FallenApple
Yeah, you forgot that black holes are puny compared to stars. Stars that go boom are at least 8 times the mass of our sun and the sun is a million km across, a neutron star is maybe a dozen.
 
  • Like
Likes FallenApple
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top