Is Arnold's Problems Worth the Price?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lonewolf
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the value of purchasing a book by V.I. Arnold, noting its higher price typical of Springer publications. Participants express confidence in Arnold's work, citing previous positive experiences with his writing on topics like hydrodynamics and classical mechanics. One user mentions they have ordered the book despite the cost, highlighting Arnold's effective educational style. The consensus leans towards the belief that Arnold's books are worth the investment due to their quality and depth. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the perceived value of Arnold's contributions to mathematics and physics.
Lonewolf
Messages
329
Reaction score
1
I'm interested in buying this book However, being a Springer book, it's a bit on the pricey side, although towards the more affordable end of pricey for Springer. Does anyone think it's worth the price?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
so far i have found no exceptions to the rule that anything by v.i.arnol'd is valuable. actually you can browse it slightly on amazon.
 
Last edited:
Well, I've taken the plunge and ordered it. I read his books on topolgical methods in hydrodynamics and mathematical methods in classical mechanics and was very impressed with his writing style and ability to educate. I've not read anything by him with a more pure mathematical bent.
 
i have his methoids of mathematical physics but have not read it, and his ode book which i like a lot, and have browsed a book on singularities as applied to diff eq. all are excellent.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top