Is Balance Considered a Sixth Sense?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balance
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the classification of human senses, specifically questioning why balance is not recognized as a sixth sense. Balance, or equilibrioception, is argued to be a distinct sense that provides critical information about orientation and spatial awareness, separate from the traditional five senses. The conversation highlights that the traditional classification of senses, attributed to Aristotle, is overly simplistic and not scientifically accurate. Modern understanding acknowledges a broader range of senses, including nociception (pain), proprioception (body position), and thermoception (temperature), among others. The lack of consensus among neurologists regarding the exact number of senses is noted, emphasizing that definitions vary based on the type of information gathered rather than the sensory organs involved. The discussion encourages a reevaluation of the senses beyond elementary definitions commonly taught in school.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,838
Reaction score
7,833
The senses are, in a nutshell, methods by which we gather information about the outside world.

I've never understood why balance is not considered a sixth sense. It is a way that we gather information about the outside world that is unique from the other senses. It tells us which way is down.

The fact that our sense of balance is located in our ear is irrelevant - the ear is merely an organ.

The fact that balance uses tiny hairs and grains to do its sensing doesn't subsume it under touch. The hairs are not touching anything external. It seems to me a sense should be defined by the type of information it gathers, not by the implementation.

Is my logic flawed?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
There is no "five senses", scientifically. That's just something Aristotle came up with that people still use because it's convenient for laypeople to remember. Scientists recognize that there are many more than that.
This is no firm agreement among neurologists as to the number of senses because of differing definitions of what constitutes a sense. One definition states that an exteroceptive sense is a faculty by which outside stimuli are perceived.[1] The traditional five senses are sight, hearing, touch, smell, taste: a classification attributed to Aristotle.[2] Humans also have at least six additional senses (a total of eleven including interoceptive senses) that include: nociception (pain), equilibrioception (balance), proprioception & kinesthesia (joint motion and acceleration), sense of time, thermoception (temperature differences), and in some a weak magnetoception (direction)[3].
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sense



We have had other threads on the subject (though it has been a while). You can do a search.
 
russ_watters said:
There is no "five senses", scientifically. That's just something Aristotle came up with that people still use because it's convenient for laypeople to remember. Scientists recognize that there are many more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sense
Right. I guess I was relying on a grade school definition of the senses. Some reading is in order.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top