Is Bell's Ansatz reasonable?

  • I
  • Thread starter jk22
  • Start date
  • #1
695
21
Bell writes for the result of measurement in A $$A (\theta_A,\lambda) $$.

It is said lambda could be any parameter.

I would like to interprete lambda and thought of two possibilities :

-$$\lambda=\phi $$ the angle of polarization of the photon arriving at A. This seems reasonable

-since lambda could be any parameter it could be : the coordinate of the universe in which result is A for the measurement setting given. Hence a many-worlds view.

Thus can we deduce from Bell theorem that if one wants to reproduce quantum results with MWI it should still use nonlocal formulas ? Hence MWI does not solve the nonlocality issue ?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Nugatory
Mentor
12,986
5,694
Thus can we deduce from Bell theorem that if one wants to reproduce quantum results with MWI it should still use nonlocal formulas ? Hence MWI does not solve the nonlocality issue ?
It's not clear what you mean by "solve the non-locality issue". It is a fact that the predictions of quantum mechanics cannot be explained by any non-local and realistic theory, but that doesn't mean that there's any "issue" to "solve". It means that if we believe the experiments that support the predictions of quantum mechanics we don't have to spend time considering hypothetical local realistic theories to explain QM.

All interpretations make the same predictions, so no interpretation can either explain or eliminate non-locality. All you can ever get from an interpretation is a more-or-less palatable way of thinking about the mathematical machinery that makes these predictions.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #3
Demystifier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
11,003
3,714
All interpretations make the same predictions, so no interpretation can either explain or eliminate non-locality.
Would you say that non-locality is a prediction or an interpretation?
I think there is no true consensus among experts.
 
  • #5
1,116
72
Reading the paper it appears that locality is preserved (since the measurement information must be transferred at c or less). However it is not still at the expense of reality?
 

Related Threads on Is Bell's Ansatz reasonable?

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
653
  • Last Post
5
Replies
110
Views
17K
Replies
105
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
199
Views
9K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • Last Post
3
Replies
55
Views
4K
Top