Is Calculus for the Practical Man a Good First Book for Self-Study?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theoristo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Practical
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the suitability of various calculus books for self-study, particularly for beginners. A notable mention is a book favored by Feynman, which is highlighted as a good starting point. Participants express interest in alternatives, with Spivak's calculus series receiving positive feedback for its depth and rigor. Demidovich's mathematical analysis book is recommended for those seeking computational practice, though it is considered challenging. Additionally, there is a request for reviews of "Calculus for the Practical Man," indicating a search for accessible introductory materials. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for a balance between theoretical understanding and practical application in selecting a calculus book for self-study.
theoristo
Messages
151
Reaction score
3
Is it a good first calculus book? Feynman used and liked it. it especially made for self study and that's what I need...did any of you use it? Is there something better?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Spivak calculus series seems to be appreciated by a lot of people...If you want something for the computation drill, Demidovich mathematical analysis book is the all time classic, even though it is now considered quite "hardcore" by some. It also includes the basics of theory you need to solve the exercises. (Well, at least like first 10% of them, later exercises usually need some kind of a trick).
 
I have Spivak I'm saving it for later ...I need an intro book and I'm also looking for a review for 'Calculus for the practical man '? did anyone use it?
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Back
Top