Is centripetal force present in inertial and non-inertial frames?

AI Thread Summary
Centripetal force is present in inertial frames, where it is necessary for circular motion, as it results from the unbalanced forces acting on an object. In non-inertial frames, such as a rotating reference frame, fictitious forces like centrifugal force appear, which can create the illusion of an outward push. This centrifugal force balances the centripetal force, allowing objects to appear stationary within that frame. Additionally, the Coriolis force, another fictitious force, affects motion on a larger scale, such as in atmospheric phenomena. Understanding these forces is crucial for analyzing motion in different reference frames.
abhijitlohiya
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
is centripetal force present in inertial and non-inertial frames?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
abhijitlohiya said:
is centripetal force present in inertial and non-inertial frames?

Centrifugal and Coriolis are sometimes called pseudo-forces.

I think the reason for this is because they do not appear in a rotating (non-inertial) reference frame.

frim wiki:

>
Circular motion
A similar effect occurs in circular motion, circular for the standpoint of an inertial frame of reference attached to the road, with the fictitious force called the centrifugal force, fictitious when seen from a non-inertial frame of reference. If a car is moving at constant speed around a circular section of road, the occupants will feel pushed outside, away from the center of the turn. Again the situation can be viewed from inertial or non-inertial frames:

1. From the viewpoint of an inertial reference frame stationary with respect to the road, the car is accelerating toward the center of the circle. This is called centripetal acceleration and requires a centripetal force to maintain the motion. This force is maintained by the friction of the wheels on the road. The car is accelerating, due to the unbalanced force, which causes it to move in a circle.

2. From the viewpoint of a rotating frame, moving with the car, there is a fictitious centrifugal force that tends to push the car toward the outside of the road (and the occupants toward the outside of the car). The centrifugal force is balanced by the acceleration of the tires inward, making the car stationary in this non-inertial frame.

>
Another fictitious force that arises in the case of circular motion is the Coriolis force, which is ordinarily visible only in very large-scale motion like the projectile motion of long-range guns or the circulation of the Earth's atmosphere. Neglecting air resistance, an object dropped from a 50 m high tower at the equator will fall 7.7 mm eastward of the spot below where it was dropped because of the Coriolis force.

>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerated_reference_frame

edited for content and format!
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top