Is Chemical Knowledge Truly Infinite?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of the infinite nature of chemical species and knowledge, prompted by the idea that either the universe is infinite or that chemical synthesis has an infinite aspect. The initial inquiry explores whether a physical trait important to chemical synthesis, such as temperature or pressure, can vary continuously rather than discretely, which would support the notion of infinite chemical possibilities. A participant clarifies that the concept of infinite variability is demonstrated in protein synthesis, where amino acids can be combined in countless ways. The conversation then shifts to whether any physical variables exist that behave in a non-discrete manner, suggesting a deeper inquiry into the intersection of chemistry and physics. The thread concludes with a suggestion to pose the more physics-oriented question in a relevant forum.
Kherubin
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
If this is the wrong place for these sorts of musings, I greatly apologize and I would be profoundly obliged if someone could point me in the right direction.

Otherwise, on with the question.

I have repeatedly heard it said that the number of chemical species and, by extension, the entirety of chemical knowledge is infinite. I have been pondering this thought plenty in recent times and would welcome the opinions of others.

The way I see it, for the number of chemical species to be infinite, one or both of two criteria must be fulfilled, those being,

1) The Universe is infinite in extent.
2) An aspect of chemical manufacture is, in itself, infinite.

Leaving aside cosmological thinking for the moment, I am particularly interested in the second criterion.

For this to be true by my reckoning, a physical facet of chemical manufacture must vary continuously, as opposed to discretely.

In this regard, is anyone aware of a physical trait important to chemical manufacture (temperature, pressure, concentration etc.) that cannot ultimately be quantized.

With that said, any thoughts, opinions, aimless meanderings of the mind would be greatly appreciated.

Kind regards,
Kherubin
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I am not sure what you mean by "chemical manufacture", I guess you mean synthesis. No, physical trait that can be not quantized is not necessary. Protein is just a chain of amino acids. There are 22 amino acids commonly used by the living organisms. Amino acids can be connected in any order, and there is no limit to the number of amino acids connected together - it is always possible to add any two amino acids to two ends of existing chain. That already means number of proteins is infinite, but there are many other substances that share similar properties that allow infinite variability.
 
Thank you for taking the time to reply to my query. (I did indeed mean chemical synthesis)

Your reply really speaks to my first criterion, that the universe is infinite. If the universe is infinite and contains an infinite amount of matter, it is then possible for conscious beings to add to molecules of any conceivable size without end.

However, if we assume that this is not the case (i.e. that we live in a universe of finite dimensions), my question then becomes, does any mechanism exist by which the structure or synthesis of a molecule can vary in a continuous way, thereby allowing chemical knowledge to again be infinite in extent.

By way of an example, I have read that the rotational bond angle around a molecule's chiral center can vary continuously, meaning that, in theory at least, the molecule can adopt an infinite variety of conformations and by extension, that the number of possible chemical structures is also infinite (although in a rather uninteresting way). However, I assume that this quantity (rotational bond angle) can ultimately too be quantized.

At a deeper level, I suppose by question can be phrased as, are there any physical variables that behave in a non-discrete fashion?

Thank you for your time,
Kherubin
 
Kherubin said:
At a deeper level, I suppose by question can be phrased as, are there any physical variables that behave in a non-discrete fashion?

Thats more like physics question. Feel free to ask it in general physics, and post link to the other thread here.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top