Chernobyl Is Cold Fusion a Valid Argument Against Nuclear Power?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theCandyman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chernobyl
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights a popular link related to Chernobyl that has sparked debate about nuclear power and alternative energy sources like cold fusion. Participants question the validity of the information presented in the linked "human interest" story, noting its lack of substantial facts. There is an acknowledgment that cold fusion is a form of nuclear power, which adds complexity to the arguments against traditional nuclear energy. The thread references extensive contributions from users like Astronuc and Morbias, who provide detailed insights into the realities of nuclear power. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for critical evaluation of information regarding nuclear energy.
theCandyman
Messages
397
Reaction score
2
I am sure everyone alredy knew, since it has been in the news and all, but I have seen the link below become quite popular on the internet. The thing is, the same people that post this link, argue aginst nuclear power and start talking about researching subjects like cold fusion.:rolleyes:

Anyway, I thought I would ask about the validity of this persons facts, just to check.

http://todayspictures.slate.com/inmotion/essay_chernobyl/
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
That is a "human interest" story and kinda thin on facts. Is there anything specific you are wondering about?
 
theCandyman said:
argue aginst nuclear power and start talking about researching subjects like cold fusion.

Nevermind that any sort of fusion IS nuclear power :smile: :smile: :smile:

Theres plenty of threads around here with, amongst other things, Astronuc's and Morbias's extensive amount of information as to the realities of nuclear power
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Back
Top