Is Conflict Resolution by Kings the Best Solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resolution
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of warfare and the potential for robotic technology to change conflict dynamics. Some argue that eliminating war altogether would be preferable, while others suggest that robotic warfare could minimize casualties. Historical references highlight Nikola Tesla's early proposals for robotic combat, which were dismissed due to cost concerns. The conversation also touches on the idea that future conflicts may be resolved through economic and informational means rather than traditional warfare. Ultimately, the effectiveness and morality of using technology in warfare remain contentious topics.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
Is this the ultimate tool of a super power, and a cowardly solution to conflict? would not (kings) fighting (kings) be be the best solution to war.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would not having a war at all be a better solution to war?
 
wolram said:
Is this the ultimate tool of a super power, and a cowardly solution to conflict? would not (kings) fighting (kings) be be the best solution to war.

Obviously you don't appreciate the thrill of robot warfare.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joDjwtjIQS8
 
Focus said:
Would not having a war at all be a better solution to war?

For sure it would.
 
wolram said:
For sure it would.

If warfare is to be eliminated, it will happen through economics and information flow, not philosophy.
 
Ivan Seeking said:
If warfare is to be eliminated, it will happen through economics and information flow, not philosophy.

Nice one Ivan.
 
Nikola Tesla proposed robotic warfare as a better means of conducting war. He apparently made demonstrations of radio controlled robots to the military but they were not interested. Probably too expensive.
 
While in high school I gave a speech in which I argued that technology could lead to warfare in which no lives need to be lost. Of course I was looking at the world through the eyes of a young American who perceived the Soviet as the only real threat. But the idea was that once one side gained an advantage by destroying the other's defenses - say for example by destroying a space based LASER shield that guards against missile attack - the other side would simply surrender or they would face certain destruction. For many years I believed that day would come, but now it seems far less likely than before.
 
  • #10
http://iss.whu.edu.cn/degaris/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
So round one is between the IDF's robotic bulldozer and the Australian's robotic haul truck.

israel_idf_d9_bulldozer.jpg



godzilla_lorry.jpg
 
Back
Top